24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

renkun79

木虫 (小有名气)

菜鸟

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 3326.4
红花: 3
帖子: 166
在线: 266.3小时
虫号: 2712427
注册: 2013-10-10
专业: 水力机械及其系统

[求助] 返回审稿意见，这是什么节奏？还送外审吗？已有11人参与

12月投了篇journal of ***大年30返回审稿意见，也没说大修还是小修。求有经验的虫虫们帮鉴定下是什么节奏？还要再审。。。
Dear Dr. **,
Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed a review for publication in Journal of ***. The editor has requested that a revised manuscript be prepared based on the reviewers' evaluations (shown at the end of this email) and submitted for re-review by 03-15-2014.Please submit the revised manuscript and a detailed response to the reviewers' criticisms by logging onto the Editorial Management system at http://***and clicking on the "Submissions Needing Revision" link.For your convenience, there is a calendar entry item attached that works with electronic calendars in the iCalendar format (e.g. Outlook, iCal, Google). To use, click to open the attachment, and then save it to your calendar.Be advised that the editor may request further revision or decline your revised version if all of the reviewers' comments have not been adequately addressed.Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Sincerely,
Editorial Coordinator
Reviewers' comments:
Editor comments: The reviewers believe that the work is of interest; the authors also have to satisfy their requirements in the new version of the paper.
Reviewer #1: Manuscript **** presents a *******. In this manuscript, the authors have utilized a different method than usual to*****. The method is novel and feasible.The subject considered is an interesting one and the paper is well organized. The Introduction outlined the proposed method well. I think that the paper is appropriate to be published in the Journal of ***after some minor revision.
1. References in the introduction should add some of the latest findings and methods.
2. There are some typos, please correct them.
3. Some of English expressions need to be further improved
4. Comparison experiment should be mentioned
Reviewer #3: The paper entitled "***" is well written to keep focusing on the research objectives. The study explained the observed results well in a reasonable manner. Therefore, the paper is suitable for publication in Journal of ***, but there are several minor drawbacks:
1.Please give a brief introduction of****, and what are the advantages of this method?
2.The language is poor; several grammatical errors are found in the text and the manuscript is written without much care. It should be checked thoroughly. For example, Page 2. Line 53-54, "Select the appropriate variables are very important in the establishment of a rational and efficient model."
Reviewer #4: The paper ****could be published after some language polishing and revision.

回复此楼