| 查看: 3145 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
renkun79木虫 (小有名气)
菜鸟
|
[求助]
返回审稿意见，这是什么节奏？还送外审吗？ 已有11人参与
|
||
|
12月投了篇journal of ***大年30返回审稿意见，也没说大修还是小修。求有经验的虫虫们帮鉴定下是什么节奏？还要再审。。。 Dear Dr. **, Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed a review for publication in Journal of ***. The editor has requested that a revised manuscript be prepared based on the reviewers' evaluations (shown at the end of this email) and submitted for re-review by 03-15-2014.Please submit the revised manuscript and a detailed response to the reviewers' criticisms by logging onto the Editorial Management system at http://***and clicking on the "Submissions Needing Revision" link.For your convenience, there is a calendar entry item attached that works with electronic calendars in the iCalendar format (e.g. Outlook, iCal, Google). To use, click to open the attachment, and then save it to your calendar.Be advised that the editor may request further revision or decline your revised version if all of the reviewers' comments have not been adequately addressed.Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, Editorial Coordinator Reviewers' comments: Editor comments: The reviewers believe that the work is of interest; the authors also have to satisfy their requirements in the new version of the paper. Reviewer #1: Manuscript **** presents a *******. In this manuscript, the authors have utilized a different method than usual to*****. The method is novel and feasible.The subject considered is an interesting one and the paper is well organized. The Introduction outlined the proposed method well. I think that the paper is appropriate to be published in the Journal of ***after some minor revision. 1. References in the introduction should add some of the latest findings and methods. 2. There are some typos, please correct them. 3. Some of English expressions need to be further improved 4. Comparison experiment should be mentioned Reviewer #3: The paper entitled "***" is well written to keep focusing on the research objectives. The study explained the observed results well in a reasonable manner. Therefore, the paper is suitable for publication in Journal of ***, but there are several minor drawbacks: 1.Please give a brief introduction of****, and what are the advantages of this method? 2.The language is poor; several grammatical errors are found in the text and the manuscript is written without much care. It should be checked thoroughly. For example, Page 2. Line 53-54, "Select the appropriate variables are very important in the establishment of a rational and efficient model." Reviewer #4: The paper ****could be published after some language polishing and revision. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
请大家帮我看看审稿人表达的真实意思
已经有10人回复
- 关于《岩石力学与工程学报》
已经有17人回复
- 这是要接收的节奏吗
已经有8人回复
- 请问论文外审通过之后录用概率大吗？
已经有10人回复
- 看来是不是要悲剧了啊
已经有42人回复
- 这样的外审意见会被拒不？
已经有8人回复
- 审稿人意见不统一 编辑一般会怎么处理
已经有12人回复
- 投了《电视技术》，稿件状态显示终审，对于修改意见不是很明白，跪求解答
已经有32人回复
- 自动化学报“等待副主编建议”
已经有20人回复
- 中国农业科学投稿两个月了，怎么还是外审，而且是四个外审专家
已经有6人回复
- 请教大家，这个是不是要跪的节奏啊。。。。
已经有3人回复
- 这是被秒拒的节奏么？
已经有14人回复
- 自动化学报投稿
已经有9人回复
- 都投稿半个月了，怎么还是awaiting editor assignment的状态
已经有4人回复
- plos one 小修后又是under view，这是又送外审了？（已接收）
已经有9人回复
kokia
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2054.2
- 散金: 1168
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 216
- 在线: 65.3小时
- 虫号: 482988
- 注册: 2007-12-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 微生物学
8楼2014-02-03 21:09:03
meimeidyh
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
进城务工人员
- 应助: 116 (高中生)
- 金币: 11474.2
- 散金: 4112
- 红花: 19
- 帖子: 2702
- 在线: 702.4小时
- 虫号: 133720
- 注册: 2005-12-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属结构材料
2楼2014-02-03 20:18:12
renkun79
木虫 (小有名气)
菜鸟
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 3326.4
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 166
- 在线: 266.3小时
- 虫号: 2712427
- 注册: 2013-10-10
- 专业: 水力机械及其系统
3楼2014-02-03 20:20:42
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2014-02-03 20:27:23
