| ²é¿´: 3150 | »Ø¸´: 18 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||||
renkun79ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
²ËÄñ
|
[ÇóÖú]
·µ»ØÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÕâÊÇʲô½Ú×ࣿ»¹ËÍÍâÉóÂ𣿠ÒÑÓÐ11È˲ÎÓë
|
|||
|
12ÔÂͶÁËÆªjournal of ***´óÄê30·µ»ØÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ò²Ã»Ëµ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ¡£ÇóÓоÑéµÄ³æ³æÃÇ°ï¼ø¶¨ÏÂÊÇʲô½Ú×ࣿ»¹ÒªÔÙÉ󡣡£¡£ Dear Dr. **, Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed a review for publication in Journal of ***. The editor has requested that a revised manuscript be prepared based on the reviewers' evaluations (shown at the end of this email) and submitted for re-review by 03-15-2014.Please submit the revised manuscript and a detailed response to the reviewers' criticisms by logging onto the Editorial Management system at http://***and clicking on the "Submissions Needing Revision" link.For your convenience, there is a calendar entry item attached that works with electronic calendars in the iCalendar format (e.g. Outlook, iCal, Google). To use, click to open the attachment, and then save it to your calendar.Be advised that the editor may request further revision or decline your revised version if all of the reviewers' comments have not been adequately addressed.Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Sincerely, Editorial Coordinator Reviewers' comments: Editor comments: The reviewers believe that the work is of interest; the authors also have to satisfy their requirements in the new version of the paper. Reviewer #1: Manuscript **** presents a *******. In this manuscript, the authors have utilized a different method than usual to*****. The method is novel and feasible.The subject considered is an interesting one and the paper is well organized. The Introduction outlined the proposed method well. I think that the paper is appropriate to be published in the Journal of ***after some minor revision. 1. References in the introduction should add some of the latest findings and methods. 2. There are some typos, please correct them. 3. Some of English expressions need to be further improved 4. Comparison experiment should be mentioned Reviewer #3: The paper entitled "***" is well written to keep focusing on the research objectives. The study explained the observed results well in a reasonable manner. Therefore, the paper is suitable for publication in Journal of ***, but there are several minor drawbacks: 1.Please give a brief introduction of****, and what are the advantages of this method? 2.The language is poor; several grammatical errors are found in the text and the manuscript is written without much care. It should be checked thoroughly. For example, Page 2. Line 53-54, "Select the appropriate variables are very important in the establishment of a rational and efficient model." Reviewer #4: The paper ****could be published after some language polishing and revision. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ070300 ѧ˶336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¶«»ª´óѧ»¯Ñ§070300£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸º£´ó£¬0703»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶304·Ö£¬Óдó´´ÏîÄ¿£¬Ëļ¶Òѹý
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÎäÀí²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì348Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
275Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÕÐ08¿¼Êýѧ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Éó¸åÈ˱í´ïµÄÕæÊµÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ¡¶ÑÒʯÁ¦Ñ§Ó빤³Ìѧ±¨¡·
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ÕâÊÇÒª½ÓÊյĽÚ×àÂð
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊÂÛÎÄÍâÉóͨ¹ýÖ®ºó¼ÓøÅÂÊ´óÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¿´À´ÊDz»ÊÇÒª±¯¾çÁ˰¡
ÒѾÓÐ42È˻ظ´
ÕâÑùµÄÍâÉóÒâ¼û»á±»¾Ü²»£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û²»Í³Ò» ±à¼Ò»°ã»áÔõô´¦Àí
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ͶÁË¡¶µçÊÓ¼¼Êõ¡·£¬¸å¼þ״̬ÏÔʾÖÕÉ󣬶ÔÓÚÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û²»ÊǺÜÃ÷°×£¬¹òÇó½â´ð
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
×Ô¶¯»¯Ñ§±¨¡°µÈ´ý¸±Ö÷±à½¨Ò顱
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Öйúũҵ¿ÆÑ§Í¶¸åÁ½¸öÔÂÁË£¬Ôõô»¹ÊÇÍâÉ󣬶øÇÒÊÇËĸöÍâÉóר¼Ò
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çë½Ì´ó¼Ò£¬Õâ¸öÊDz»ÊÇÒª¹òµÄ½Ú×à°¡¡£¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÕâÊDZ»Ãë¾ÜµÄ½Ú×àô£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
×Ô¶¯»¯Ñ§±¨Í¶¸å
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¶¼Í¶¸å°ë¸öÔÂÁË£¬Ôõô»¹ÊÇawaiting editor assignmentµÄ״̬
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
plos one СÐÞºóÓÖÊÇunder view£¬ÕâÊÇÓÖËÍÍâÉóÁË£¿£¨ÒѽÓÊÕ£©
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´

jinwei331
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 3742 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ½ð±Ò: 28683.7
- ºì»¨: 73
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 26959
- ÔÚÏß: 1170.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2085922
- ×¢²á: 2012-10-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »úе²âÊÔÀíÂÛÓë¼¼Êõ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-03 22:23:12
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-03 22:23:12
| °´ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÖðÌõÐ޸ģ¬Ó¦ÎÞ´óÎÊÌ⣬Ð޸ĸåÒ»°ãÊÇÐèÒªËÍ»ØÉó¸åÈËÔÙÉóµÄ¡£ |
6Â¥2014-02-03 20:48:06
meimeidyh
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
½ø³ÇÎñ¹¤ÈËÔ±
- Ó¦Öú: 116 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 11474.2
- É¢½ð: 4112
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 2702
- ÔÚÏß: 702.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 133720
- ×¢²á: 2005-12-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô½á¹¹²ÄÁÏ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, µÚÒ»¸ö»Ø´ð 2014-02-03 22:22:05
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, µÚÒ»¸ö»Ø´ð 2014-02-03 22:22:05
|
Èý¸öÉó¸åÈ˶¼¸øµÄСÐÞ£¬ºÃºÃ¸Ä£¬Ã»ÎÊÌâµÄ¡£ÏÈ×£ºØÄãÁË¡£ [ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ] |
2Â¥2014-02-03 20:18:12
renkun79
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
²ËÄñ
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3326.4
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 166
- ÔÚÏß: 266.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2712427
- ×¢²á: 2013-10-10
- רҵ: Ë®Á¦»úе¼°Æäϵͳ

3Â¥2014-02-03 20:20:42
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ïÓаïÖú 2014-02-03 22:22:42
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
renkun79: ½ð±Ò+1, ¡ïÓаïÖú 2014-02-03 22:22:42
|
submitted for re-review by 03-15-2014 »¹ÒªÔÙÈÃÉó¸åÈË¿´Ò»Ï |
4Â¥2014-02-03 20:27:23













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥