24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

weixu527

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1517.8
散金: 11
红花: 1
帖子: 60
在线: 54.6小时
虫号: 1707049
注册: 2012-03-21
专业: 固体无机化学

[求助] 审稿意见如下所示，这是什么意思，希望大家指导一下，非常感谢已有2人参与

Reviewer #1: In my opinion, the objective of the manuscript not aligned to the goal of the journal Energy Conversion and Management. The manuscript could be most useful in the journal Thermochimica Acta.

Reviewer #2: The research is very experimantal and mathematical completed.

Reviewer #3: Good paper, well organized, many experimental and modelling data.

Comments:

1.    Chapter 2.1
It is necessary to give information about the material: if the granular or powdered material, which is the mean particle size (or give granulation), what is the porosity of the layer...

2.    Chapter 2.3
Table 1.
It might be good to add in Reference field which material was dried.

3.    Chapter 3.2
Tables 2-5 are very unclear. It would be good to give them in Appendix and in the text give table with the best results (Midilli-Kucuk model). It can be given the percentage values how much the Midilli-Kucuk model is better in compare to other models.

Figure 6 and 7 are unclear. It give us similar data as in figure 2 and 3. My suggestion is to draw 4 figures: each for one temperature. Axes arrangement would be the same and data would be for atmospheric and vacuum pressure (both experimental and modelling curve).

Additional Comment from the Editor: Please update your literature survey by referring to the most recent and relevant references that have been published in highly ranked and prestigious journals, and especially in Energy Conversion and Management, to draw the attention of our readers.

I hope these comments will be helpful to you. My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is a very good basis on which I can recommend that this paper be modified in a responsive manner to the comments above.

In the revision process we would like to request you return three files:
(1) Please submit a list or table of changes (or your rebuttal) against each point raised when you upload your revised article and upload this as your 'Response to Reviewers' file/doc - note our system will not allow you to complete the resubmission process without this file.
(2) Also please highlight any revised text using coloured highlighting in a separate word document.  This will enable the Editor /Reviewers to identify the amendments and subsequently make faster decisions on the revisions.
(3) In addition we request one final file, a 'clean' word document of the revised manuscript without any annotations, highlighting or comments, in font 10 or 12 pt with double line spacing.

If the modification is done carefully and completely, upon re-submission and evaluation, I think you can be confident that the paper will be accepted for publication in Energy Conversion and Management. Thank you again for sending this paper to Energy Conversion and Management for consideration.

NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at: http://www.elsevier.com/journals ... 4/guide-for-authors

When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items:

We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines.  Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information.
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ... 4/guide-for-authors

Highlights (mandatory)

Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information
http://www.elsevier.com/highlights

Graphical Abstract (optional)

Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: http://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation

回复此楼