24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

braveheart8

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 5784.2
帖子: 171
在线: 284.7小时
虫号: 1051373

[交流] 论文修改求助

本人第一次投一个SCI期刊，以下是返回的修改意见，大家帮看看应如何修改。特别是对于第二个专家的意见“In my opinion, I don't think that it is an important contribution to art of state. ”。非常感谢！

I can now come back to you with a decision about the article you submitted to the Journal.

We think this a promising article, and would like to invite you to revise and resubmit the article, taking into account the reviewers' comments below. Your paper will be sent for re-review with the same reviewers, and we will then make a final decision.

The reviewers' comments were:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Referee #1 (Comments for the Author):

This paper contains an interesting method for defining xx. The case study is interesting and well explained.
At the moment the main weakness of the article is the discuss section. A larger discussion should be included, to reflect also on what this work offers compared to existing literature. The authors should emphasise and discuss the contribution of their work much more profoundly than is done in the current text.
Moreover the analysis of previous work carried out in section 1 is too limited.

Referee #3 (Comments for the Author):

The authors try to present xxx model for xxxxx. However, they don't give enough motivations. They only focus on the technical details. In my opinion, I don't think that it is an important contribution to art of state.

Editor's Comments:
Please address the issues raised by e referees. It is especially important that the literature review is right up to date and that the contribution that your work makes is clearly spelt out.

回复此楼