| 查看: 1279 | 回复: 8 | ||||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||||||
Lopemann荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
|
[交流]
Writing Activity 2, December 7th to December 9th(One article available)
|
|||||
|
Guys I know English writing has become more and more an issue. Having seen this, I want to run a series of writing activities for the following month.  Feel free to participate.  Just keep in mind. No matter how much you read, how much you listen, if you never ever actually write something, there is no way for you to write a good article in examination condition. If you do not want to write anything but have the proofreading ability, you are also more than welcomed to pick up others' mistakes  All the writing activities will be put in a folder I made. You can subscribe it if you want. http://muchong.com/bbs/taotie.php?action=view&ttid=46562 After you finish writing this topic, please post your article here. If I've got enough time, I can do some proofreading for you but it's not guaranteed. I will highlight the articles I think highly of. Activity two: Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion? [ Last edited by Lopemann on 2013-12-9 at 19:45 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 English Writing |
» 猜你喜欢
300求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
材料相关专业344求调剂双非工科学校或课题组
已经有26人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
一志愿沪9，326求生物学调剂
已经有12人回复
-
0854求调剂
已经有26人回复
-
生物学调剂
已经有10人回复
-
求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
320求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
接受任何调剂
已经有7人回复
-
化学070300 求调剂
已经有29人回复
★
小木虫: 沙发+1，金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发，再给个红包
小木虫: 沙发+1，金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发，再给个红包
| 8 |
2楼2013-12-07 21:45:16
★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳，给个红包
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳，给个红包
| 8 |
3楼2013-12-07 21:45:31
19890608xcs2
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 2327.9
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 463
- 在线: 336.6小时
- 虫号: 2035588
- 注册: 2012-09-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
00waterh: only English is allowed here, thank you for your understanding. 2013-12-08 18:28:35
| 沙发 |
4楼2013-12-08 16:26:28
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-
专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2013-12-09 19:45:44
curton: 金币+12, ESEPI+1, From my perspective, working experience is one of the most important evaluations when considering promotion, but it should never be the only criterion of elevation, or it is going to be devastating. 2014-01-07 17:24:39
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2013-12-09 19:45:44
curton: 金币+12, ESEPI+1, From my perspective, working experience is one of the most important evaluations when considering promotion, but it should never be the only criterion of elevation, or it is going to be devastating. 2014-01-07 17:24:39
|
Here is an article I wrote about one year ago. You guys can still spot many problems. In some corporations, it is quite common to see that those who are in charge tend to be those who stay in the company long enough. Behind such phenomenon always lies a well-rooted view that considerable working experience is the prerequisite of promotion. However, this view also sparks some controversies because an increasing number of people begin to be aware of the limitation of this kind of promotion “institution”. One’s staying in one company long enough will undoubtedly give the person enough experience to resolve different thorny dilemmas, which is one of the most important characteristics of a team leader. It is normal to see that new employees on most of the occasions in a company typically have a poor performance, which always leads to the dissatisfaction of higher-ups as well as clients, and meanwhile which influences the future of the whole company. Improving working performance undoubtedly requires time, so it is understandable to some extent that some companies give priority to old workers when considering promotion. However, limitations of this promotion “institution” are at the same time quite evident. One's trait as well as the prospect of the company with other similar factors should be taken into consideration when he is promoted, and any simple evaluation as well as hasty decision of it should be avoided. Keeping balance among these factors is of great importance, because it guarantees the innovation of the idea brought by freshmen as well as reduces the error rates to the credit of old workers. Attaching too much importance will inevitably upset this balance, then ruining the prospect of the company. From my perspective, working experience is one of the most important evaluations when considering promotion, but it should never be the only criterion of elevation, or it is going to be devastating. [ Last edited by Lopemann on 2013-12-10 at 15:28 ] |
5楼2013-12-09 19:44:47
muguam
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2412.7
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 378
- 在线: 78.9小时
- 虫号: 2428045
- 注册: 2013-04-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 会计与审计
6楼2013-12-10 10:31:38
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
curton: 金币+12, ESEPI+1, To conclude, I prefer to agree that employees who worked in a company for a long time are more likely to reach a high postion. 2014-01-07 17:24:58
curton: 回帖置顶 2014-01-07 17:25:00
curton: 金币+12, ESEPI+1, To conclude, I prefer to agree that employees who worked in a company for a long time are more likely to reach a high postion. 2014-01-07 17:24:58
curton: 回帖置顶 2014-01-07 17:25:00
|
One who has been in a company for a long time shows his or her loylaty for the company, thereby bringing multiple benefits for the company such as a stable relationship among employees. It is naturally that some people maintain that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to be higher position. Personally. I toally disagree with the above statement. The following are my reasons. Firstly, the bottle line is tthat employees should bear excellent performances in the company when a company promote a person. It is impossible that Bill Gate at microsoft company will promote them if engineers seldom make contributions to the company., in turn, they will alway become odinary people who everyone can neglect in the company. It is hardly to imagine for us that Jack Ma who has runed his one of biggest B2B companies can promote ones who worked for a long time to be higher position than those have alway novel ideas but are greeners. Secondly, to say only staff who worked in a company for a lone time should be promoted to higher position does not hold. For a smart boss. Everyone in his company will be equally considered to promote to be higher postion. Admittedly, employees who worked in a company for a long time, have much more exprience. Therefore, in terms of experience, they are superior to others in the company. But compared with these employees, those who make much contributes to the company should not neglect. To conclude, I prefer to agree that employees who worked in a company for a long time are more likely to reach a high postion. |
7楼2013-12-10 21:56:59
文明在这里
金虫 (小有名气)
律师
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1561.2
- 散金: 18
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 253
- 在线: 42.3小时
- 虫号: 2401652
- 注册: 2013-04-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论法学
8楼2013-12-10 23:13:40
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-
专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe
9楼2013-12-11 08:18:37
