24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1214  |  回复: 3

酸奶一号

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请各位SCI大牛看看该审稿意见如何回复

本人投稿一篇比较不同品种牛奶中脂肪酸含量的文章于“journal of food composition and analysis”,四个月后审稿人意见中有一条如下,不知该如何回复。
Quality control: Use of published references does not guarantee accurate and precise results in another's hands, or even in every run within a person's laboratory if a new method is being developed. It is necessary to validate that the results are accurate for the matrix being analysed, and also to include a control sample in every batch to account for possible aberrations in assay performance in any particular run. It is well known that even in the most carefully controlled laboratories, batch-specific errors can occur that are undetectable in the absence of a control sample. Without appropriate QC, such differences would be falsely attributed to samples, not analytical error.
测定脂肪酸时我也是按照ISO标准进行测定,而且实验室在这方面技术已经成熟,因此实验数据准确性还是有的,但该审稿人建议做“control sample”在每一个处理中,不知是何意思,请各位大牛帮忙解释一下,小虫不胜感激。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

DNA-RNA-dsRNA-ssRNA-cDNAs
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwdongyn

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不做阳性对照品的活性

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2楼2013-10-24 00:30:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwdongyn

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

补做阳性对照品的活性

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
3楼2013-10-24 00:31:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jinwei331

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
应该是对你样品的广泛性提出质疑,抽样的控制是如何做的。
4楼2013-10-24 06:42:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 酸奶一号 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见