7月8号收到大修意见，现在想了半个月，也不知怎么进行更深入的研究，黔驴技穷了啊。求解
如下式审稿二的意见，一三审稿人给的是好的回复。
Reviewer #2: The authors did not address most of my comments satisfactory. Here are my detail responses to their responses。
For response 2, I don't think analysis the coefficient of K is considered to be a deep analysis。
For response 4, I don't think that the results can provide deeper insights.
Other comments:
The authors should put more effort to the second part to have a significant contribution for publication。
编辑意见：
Comments from the AE:
Please respond carefully to the comments of reviewer 2. Unless this reviewer is satisfied I will not recommend publication.
回复此楼
+1/169
