| ²é¿´: 694 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
°ïÎÒÈóɫһ¶Î»°£¬ººÒëÓ¢£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
|
||
|
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¶Î»°ÖÐÓÐûÓÐʲô벡£¬¿ÉÒÔ¼ÓһЩ´Ê£¬¼õһЩ´Ê£¬Ê¹Ëü¸üÁ÷³©Ò»Ð©£¬Ð»Ð»´ó¼Ò¡£ Interface damping at different temperatures were calculated from equations (9), and table 3 listed typical values of interface damping of the three samples at various temperatures. Form table 3, the interface damping of three samples exhibited comparable damping capacity at temperatures of 25, 125, 200, and 250¡ãC. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ºÏ·ÊÇøÓòÐÔÖØµãÒ»±¾ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
22408 359·Öµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085602»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á£¨331·Ö£©
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
085701»·¾³¹¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á£¬²»ÏÞרҵ£¬ÓÐѧÉϾÍÐÐ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦·¶´óѧÓлú»¯Ñ§×¨Òµ£¬³õÊÔ351·Ö£¬¸´ÊÔ±»Ë¢Çóµ÷¼Á!
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
266·Ö£¬Çó²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´

hookhans
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Farmer
- ·ÒëEPI: 263
- Ó¦Öú: 186 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.142
- ½ð±Ò: 8012.5
- É¢½ð: 576
- ºì»¨: 51
- Ìû×Ó: 2085
- ÔÚÏß: 400.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2260260
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-25
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-04-07 17:55:24
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-04-07 17:55:24
| Ref: Interface damping resutls at different temperatures were calculated from equations (9), and the typical interface damping values of the three samples at various temperatures are tabulated in Table 3. It can be seen that the interface damping of the three samples exhibit comparable damping capacities at temperatures of 25, 125, 200, and 250¡ãC. |

5Â¥2013-04-07 08:40:40
phu_grassman
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
¿ìÀÖµº¡¢²¼¼ªµºµºÖ÷
- ·ÒëEPI: 265
- Ó¦Öú: 7 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.392
- ½ð±Ò: 7538.7
- É¢½ð: 11599
- ºì»¨: 107
- ɳ·¢: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 5611
- ÔÚÏß: 1480.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1151372
- ×¢²á: 2010-11-20
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+1, ·ÒëEPI+1 2013-04-07 17:54:58
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+1, ·ÒëEPI+1 2013-04-07 17:54:58
| Interface damping at different temperature was calculated from the equations in (9), and typical values of interface damping of the three samples at various temperature were listed in Table 3, from which we can see that the interface damping of three samples exhibits comparable damping capacity at temperature of 25, 125, 200 and 250¡ãC. |
2Â¥2013-04-06 20:20:42
yimin58
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
ttxd
- ·ÒëEPI: 15
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3845.3
- Ìû×Ó: 142
- ÔÚÏß: 116.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2084983
- ×¢²á: 2012-10-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
phu_grassman: ½ð±Ò+2, good 2013-04-06 21:10:39
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-04-07 17:55:04
phu_grassman: ½ð±Ò+2, good 2013-04-06 21:10:39
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+2, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-04-07 17:55:04
| Interface damping at different temperature was calculated from Eq. 9, and the typical values of interface damping of the three samples at various temperatures listed in Table 3 exhibited comparable damping capacity at 25, 125, 200, and 250¡ãC. |
3Â¥2013-04-06 21:02:00
yimin58
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
ttxd
- ·ÒëEPI: 15
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3845.3
- Ìû×Ó: 142
- ÔÚÏß: 116.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2084983
- ×¢²á: 2012-10-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2013-04-06 21:52:58














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥