24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 462  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chunchuna

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 审稿意见回来了,大家给看看 啊

我做的是理论的路径,没做实验,然后回来两个审稿审稿人的意见都提到了实验的问题,大家给我看看如果我不做实验,能不能行啊
Reviewer #2:
The technique including the equipment and algorithm is presented along with a simulation of the results. No experimental work is detailed though. This should be presented to validate the model and technique. Until this is provided, then the technique cannot be detailed as successful and I would not recommend that the manuscript be accepted for publication.

Reviewer #3:
- Most of the study is focused on the geometrical derivations associated with tool path generation. However, I would recommend the authors to include some proof capable to demonstrate that the proposed approach works in practice, because otherwise the reader is tempted to assume that this is a pure theoretical study. Evidently, the machining tests performed should be capable to both: i) support the advantages of 3D EVC, and ii) validate the tool path calculations detailed in the manuscript.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pjstang

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
从审稿意见来看,估计是得做实验了 。毕竟审稿人的语气很坚定。
加油吧,顺便散点BB攒rp。
3楼2013-03-24 16:18:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

LT_FU

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
自己不能做实验,可以找别人的实验来验证你的模型啊
2楼2013-03-24 15:58:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见
4楼2013-03-24 17:14:39
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
信息提示
请填处理意见