²é¿´: 508  |  »Ø¸´: 2
±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·­ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴

ÄûÃÊÊ÷

гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] ÄóöÒ»°ë¼Ò²ú,Çó¸ßÊÖ°ïÎÒµÄÒ»¶ÎÓ¢ÎÄÈóÉ«°¡.лл

1¡£The structures of the AlN(1 nm)/MN(d nm)/AlN(1 nm) are sketched in Fig. 1 (a). Fig. 1 (b) shows the AR-H curves for the AlN(1 nm)/MN(d nm)/AlN(1 nm) films [d =5, 30, 80] before and after annealing at 400 ¡ãC. One can see the AR value drops from 1.0% for the as-deposited sample to about only 0.2% for the annealed one when d =5 nm. However, for d =30 nm, the AR value reaches about 3% for the annealed sample, which is very close to that of the sample in the as-grown state. In contrast, when d =80 nm, the AR value increases from 3.7% for the as-deposited sample to 4.7% for the annealed one, the value of which even exceeds the bulk value. As expected, Figure 1(c) shows the relationship between the AR and the MN thickness for the  AlN/MN/AlN before and after annealing at 400 ¡ãC. It is noted that the AR values of the annealed samples are significantly lower than those of the as-grown ones when d < 30nm, whereas when the film thickness exceeds a critical thickness of 30nm, AR values of the annealed samples are significantly higher than those of the as-deposited samples. Apparently, AR change after annealing shows a significant thickness dependent behavior.

ÎÄÖÐÓÐЩ½á¹¹±»Ìæ»»µôÁË£¬Çë¼ûÁÂ
2. the grain size changes little after annealing, so in this case, what causing the abnormal resistivity increase and the resulted  AR reduction remains indefinitive.

[ Last edited by ÄûÃÊÊ÷ on 2013-3-23 at 12:05 ]
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

bwshanxi

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

½á¹¹AlN£¨1ÄÉÃ×£©/ MN£¨dÄÉÃ×£©/AlN£¨1ÄÉÃ×£©µÄ»æÖÆÈçͼ1£¨a£©Í¼1£¨b£©±íʾÍË»ðǰºÍÍË»ðºó¶ÔAR-HµÄAlN£¨1ÄÉÃ×£©/ MN£¨dÄÉÃ×£©/AlN£¨1ÄÉÃ×£©±¡Ä¤¡²d= 5£¬30£¬80] ÇúÏßÔÚ400¡æ¡£¿ÉÒÔ¿´µ½ARÖµ´Ó1.0£¥Ï½µÎª³Á»ýµÄÑùÆ·´óÔ¼Ö»ÓÐ0.2£¥µÄÍË»ðµ±d =5ÄÉÃ×ʱºò¡£È»¶ø£¬µ±d =30nmʱºò£¬ÔÚARÖµ´ïµ½ÍË»ðµÄÑùÆ·µÄÔ¼3£¥£¬ÕâÊǷdz£½Ó½üÔÚÉú³¤×´Ì¬µÄÑùÆ·¡£Ïà·´£¬µ±d =80nmʱºò£¬ARµÄÖµ´Ó3.7£¥Ôö¼ÓΪ³Á»ýÑùÆ·ÍË»ðµÄ1ÖÁ4.7£¥£¬ÉõÖÁ³¬¹ý´óÈÝÁ¿Öµ£¬ËüµÄÖµ¡£ÕýÈçÔ¤ÆÚµÄÄÇÑù£¬Í¼1£¨c£©Ê¾³öµÄ¹ØÏµÖ®¼äµÄARºÍMNºñ¶ÈµÄAlN/ MN/ AlN³ÉǰºÍÍË»ðºó£¬ÔÚ400¡æÏÂÖµµÃ×¢ÒâµÄÊÇ£¬ÍË»ðºóµÄÑùÆ·µÄARÖµÃ÷ÏÔµÍÓÚÄÇЩÉú³¤µÄµ±d<30nm×óÓÒ£¬¶øµ±±¡Ä¤ºñ¶È³¬¹ýijһÁÙ½çºñ¶ÈΪ30nmʱ£¬ÍË»ðºóµÄÑùÆ·µÄARÖµÏÔןßÓÚÈç´Ë³Á»ýµÄÑùÆ·¡£ÏÔÈ»£¬AR±ä»¯ºóÍË»ðÏÔʾÁËÏÔ×ŵĺñ¶ÈÒÀÀµÐÐΪ¡£
±¾ÈËÆ·µÂºÃ,ÇڷܺÃѧ!ÇڷܳÁµíÓÅÐã,ÀíÏëÔì¾ÍÈËÉú!!
2Â¥2013-03-23 12:48:41
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

hookhans

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

Farmer

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
ÄûÃÊÊ÷: ½ð±Ò+30, ·­ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, ·Ç³£ÓÐÓà ·Ç³£¸Ðл°¡ 2013-03-23 16:30:52
1¡£The structures of the AlN(1 nm)/MN(d nm)/AlN(1 nm) and the AR-H curves of the AlN(1 nm)/MN(d nm)/AlN(1 nm) films [d =5, 30, 80] before and after annealing at 400 ¡ãC are shown in Fig. 1 (a) and Fig. 1 (b), respectively. It can be seen that the AR value drops from 1.0% to 0.2% after annealing the sample with d =5 nm. However, for the sample with d =30 nm, the AR value reaches about 3% after annealing, which is very close to that of the as-grown sample. In contrast, the AR value increases from 3.7% to 4.7% for the sample with d =80 nm after annealing, (the value of) which even exceeds the bulk value.
Figure 1(c) shows the relationship between the AR and the MN thickness of the  AlN/MN/AlN before and after annealing at 400 ¡ãC. It is noted that the AR values of the annealed samples are significantly lower than those of the as-grown ones when d < 30nm, whereas the AR values of the annealed samples are significantly higher than those of the as-deposited samples when the film thickness exceeds a critical thickness of 30nm. Apparently, AR change after annealing shows a significant thickness dependent behavior.

2. Since the grain size changes little after annealing, it still remains unclear exactly what causes the increase of the abnormal resistivity and the consequent AR reduction.
where-there-is-a-will-there-is-a-way.
3Â¥2013-03-23 16:16:15
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ÄûÃÊÊ÷ µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 3/150 2026-03-19 14:11 by peike
[¿¼ÑÐ] 311Çóµ÷¼Á +6 26ÑÐ0 2026-03-15 6/300 2026-03-18 14:43 by haxia
[¿¼ÑÐ] 311Çóµ÷¼Á +11 ¶¬Ê®Èý 2026-03-15 12/600 2026-03-18 14:36 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á £¬Áù¼¶Òѹý£¬ÓпÆÑо­Àú +10 êØÎõÙâ 2026-03-15 10/500 2026-03-18 14:19 by 007_lilei
[¿¼ÑÐ] 070300»¯Ñ§319Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ½õÀð0909 2026-03-17 6/300 2026-03-18 13:22 by Iveryant
[¿¼ÑÐ] 265Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÁºÁºÐ£Ð£ 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 09:12 by zhukairuo
[¿¼ÑÐ] 334Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶ÒâÔÚ»úÐ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-18 08:34 by lm4875102
[¿¼²©] 26²©Ê¿ÉêÇë +3 1042136743 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-17 23:30 by ÇáËɲ»ÉÙËæ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÓÐûÓеÀÌú/ÍÁľµÄÏëµ÷¼ÁÄÏÁÖ£¬¸ø×Ô¼ºÕÐʦµÜÖС« +3 TqlXswl 2026-03-16 7/350 2026-03-17 15:23 by TqlXswl
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì£¨085601£©×¨Ë¶ÓпÆÑо­ÀúÈýÏî¹ú½±Á½¸öʵÓÃÐÍרÀûÒ»ÏîÊ¡¼¶Á¢Ïî +6 ´ó»ðɽС»ðɽ 2026-03-16 8/400 2026-03-17 15:05 by ÎÞи¿É»÷111
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á +3 ä¿ya_~ 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-17 09:25 by Winj1e
[¿¼ÑÐ] 283Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ìý·ç¾ÍÊÇÓꣻ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-17 07:41 by ÈÈÇéɳĮ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¶«ÄÏ´óѧ364Çóµ÷¼Á +5 JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 21:28 by ľ¹Ï¸à
[¿¼ÑÐ] 304Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ËØÄê¼ÀÓï 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 17:00 by ÎҵĴ¬Îҵĺ£
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 285·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +5 ly3471z 2026-03-13 5/250 2026-03-16 16:16 by ŶŶ123
[¿¼ÑÐ] 327Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ʰ¹âÈÎȾ 2026-03-15 11/550 2026-03-15 22:47 by ʰ¹âÈÎȾ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ±¾¿ÆÄϾ©´óѧһ־Ը´¨´óҩѧ327 +3 ÂóÌï¸ûÕß 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-14 20:04 by ÍâÐÇÎÄÃ÷
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á 085600Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ×Ü·Ö302 ǰÈý¿Æ235 ¾«Í¨»úÆ÷ѧϰ Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó +4 ÁÖyaxin 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 22:04 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] £Û0860£Ý321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¬abÇø½Ô¿É +4 ±¦¹óÈÈ 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-13 22:01 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 308Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÊÇLupa°¡ 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 14:30 by Çóµ÷¼Ázz
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û