24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 701  |  回复: 2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ywl_5234

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请教:审稿人的这句话是什么意思

去年一篇文章投稿SCI期刊后,编辑返回修改,其中有条审稿意见为:
1.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
不知道这条修改意见是什么意思。

from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.  【从这个角度来说,该文的科学相关性?/科学适用性 应该更加明显些?】审稿人到底什么意思呢?请教各位大侠。

附审稿人1的意见:
The paper is therefore of practical interest - particularly for engineers working in an industrial context - and is worthy of publication in Ocean Engineering. However, some amendment should be performed prior to publication.
   1.Expression of the added mass/damping coefficients should be given in a non dimensional form, hence highlighting the geometrical/physical parameters of influence - this would clearly give a ground to the proposed simplifications in the application under concern.
   2.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
   第二条修改意见什么意思呢?求教各位。谢谢

[ Last edited by ywl_5234 on 2013-3-21 at 14:28 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lxl7908

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by mojieren at 2013-03-24 17:13:06
审稿人认为你针对FSI问题的added mass/damping 系数计算这样的内容不够吸引人不够新颖,因为已经在很多之前类似的的文献中出现过
如果你不认可,当然可以反驳
如果你认可的话那就看可否增加一些相关的新内容让你的 ...

其实不是这个意思。关于这一条,审稿人说“Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references”表明他认为关于added mass/damping coefficients for FSI的计算方法已有很多人作过研究,不是你的独创,所以你在叙述这个问题时不能把别人的相关工作略过不提(说白了,就是不要贪功),即“the scientific relevance of the paper(the paper指别人的相关文章)”。
如果你的方法确实有独创,那么可以把他们的方法提出来进行比较,那样你的独创点将会更为清晰。
3楼2014-04-02 22:37:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ywl_5234: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2013-03-26 18:44:21
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2013-03-24 17:13:06
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
信息提示
请填处理意见