24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 759  |  回复: 2

ywl_5234

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请教:审稿人的这句话是什么意思

去年一篇文章投稿SCI期刊后,编辑返回修改,其中有条审稿意见为:
1.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
不知道这条修改意见是什么意思。

from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.  【从这个角度来说,该文的科学相关性?/科学适用性 应该更加明显些?】审稿人到底什么意思呢?请教各位大侠。

附审稿人1的意见:
The paper is therefore of practical interest - particularly for engineers working in an industrial context - and is worthy of publication in Ocean Engineering. However, some amendment should be performed prior to publication.
   1.Expression of the added mass/damping coefficients should be given in a non dimensional form, hence highlighting the geometrical/physical parameters of influence - this would clearly give a ground to the proposed simplifications in the application under concern.
   2.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
   第二条修改意见什么意思呢?求教各位。谢谢

[ Last edited by ywl_5234 on 2013-3-21 at 14:28 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ywl_5234: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2013-03-26 18:44:21
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2013-03-24 17:13:06
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

lxl7908

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by mojieren at 2013-03-24 17:13:06
审稿人认为你针对FSI问题的added mass/damping 系数计算这样的内容不够吸引人不够新颖,因为已经在很多之前类似的的文献中出现过
如果你不认可,当然可以反驳
如果你认可的话那就看可否增加一些相关的新内容让你的 ...

其实不是这个意思。关于这一条,审稿人说“Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references”表明他认为关于added mass/damping coefficients for FSI的计算方法已有很多人作过研究,不是你的独创,所以你在叙述这个问题时不能把别人的相关工作略过不提(说白了,就是不要贪功),即“the scientific relevance of the paper(the paper指别人的相关文章)”。
如果你的方法确实有独创,那么可以把他们的方法提出来进行比较,那样你的独创点将会更为清晰。
3楼2014-04-02 22:37:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ywl_5234 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 086003食品工程求调剂 +4 淼淼111 2026-03-24 4/200 2026-03-24 11:53 by 544594351
[考研] 材料与化工328分调剂 +4 。,。,。,。i 2026-03-23 4/200 2026-03-24 11:03 by 544594351
[考研] 0854电子信息求调剂 +3 α____ 2026-03-22 3/150 2026-03-22 21:28 by zhq0425
[考研] 307求调剂 +11 冷笙123 2026-03-17 11/550 2026-03-22 20:16 by edmund7
[考研] 289求调剂 +7 怀瑾握瑜l 2026-03-20 7/350 2026-03-22 15:57 by ColorlessPI
[考研] 求调剂院校信息 +6 CX 330 2026-03-21 6/300 2026-03-22 15:25 by 无懈可击111
[考研] 求调剂 +4 要好好无聊 2026-03-21 4/200 2026-03-21 18:57 by 学员8dgXkO
[考研] 一志愿南大,0703化学,分数336,求调剂 +3 收到VS 2026-03-21 3/150 2026-03-21 18:42 by 学员8dgXkO
[考研] 313求调剂 +4 肆叁贰壹22 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-21 17:33 by ColorlessPI
[考研] 求调剂 +3 .m.. 2026-03-21 4/200 2026-03-21 16:25 by barlinike
[考研] 材料 336 求调剂 +3 An@. 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-21 01:39 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 321求调剂 +9 何润采123 2026-03-18 11/550 2026-03-20 23:19 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 一志愿武汉理工材料工程专硕调剂 +9 Doleres 2026-03-19 9/450 2026-03-20 22:36 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 中南大学化学学硕337求调剂 +3 niko- 2026-03-19 6/300 2026-03-20 21:58 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 一志愿吉林大学材料学硕321求调剂 +11 Ymlll 2026-03-18 15/750 2026-03-20 19:40 by 丁丁*
[考研] 求调剂 +3 @taotao 2026-03-20 3/150 2026-03-20 19:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 086500 325 求调剂 +3 领带小熊 2026-03-19 3/150 2026-03-20 18:38 by 尽舜尧1
[考研] 招收调剂硕士 +4 lidianxing 2026-03-19 12/600 2026-03-20 12:25 by lidianxing
[考研] 材料学硕318求调剂 +5 February_Feb 2026-03-19 5/250 2026-03-19 23:51 by 23Postgrad
[考研] 材料工程专硕调剂 +5 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 6/300 2026-03-18 22:55 by 204818@lcx
信息提示
请填处理意见