24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 750  |  回复: 2

ywl_5234

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请教:审稿人的这句话是什么意思

去年一篇文章投稿SCI期刊后,编辑返回修改,其中有条审稿意见为:
1.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
不知道这条修改意见是什么意思。

from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.  【从这个角度来说,该文的科学相关性?/科学适用性 应该更加明显些?】审稿人到底什么意思呢?请教各位大侠。

附审稿人1的意见:
The paper is therefore of practical interest - particularly for engineers working in an industrial context - and is worthy of publication in Ocean Engineering. However, some amendment should be performed prior to publication.
   1.Expression of the added mass/damping coefficients should be given in a non dimensional form, hence highlighting the geometrical/physical parameters of influence - this would clearly give a ground to the proposed simplifications in the application under concern.
   2.Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references (e.g. Blevins, 1979: "Formulas for Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes", or offshore engineering publications); from that perspective, the scientific relevance of the paper should be made more conspicuous.
   第二条修改意见什么意思呢?求教各位。谢谢

[ Last edited by ywl_5234 on 2013-3-21 at 14:28 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ywl_5234: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2013-03-26 18:44:21
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2013-03-24 17:13:06
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

lxl7908

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by mojieren at 2013-03-24 17:13:06
审稿人认为你针对FSI问题的added mass/damping 系数计算这样的内容不够吸引人不够新颖,因为已经在很多之前类似的的文献中出现过
如果你不认可,当然可以反驳
如果你认可的话那就看可否增加一些相关的新内容让你的 ...

其实不是这个意思。关于这一条,审稿人说“Calculation of added mass/damping coefficients for FSI problems can be found in numerous references”表明他认为关于added mass/damping coefficients for FSI的计算方法已有很多人作过研究,不是你的独创,所以你在叙述这个问题时不能把别人的相关工作略过不提(说白了,就是不要贪功),即“the scientific relevance of the paper(the paper指别人的相关文章)”。
如果你的方法确实有独创,那么可以把他们的方法提出来进行比较,那样你的独创点将会更为清晰。
3楼2014-04-02 22:37:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ywl_5234 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 085600材料工程一志愿中科大总分312求调剂 +9 吃宵夜1 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-02 20:14 by hypershenger
[考研] 268求调剂 +7 简单点0 2026-03-02 9/450 2026-03-02 20:10 by 简单点0
[考研] 0805总分292,求调剂 +10 幻想之殇 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-02 19:51 by zhukairuo
[考研] 0854总分272 +3 打小就是老实人 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-02 19:49 by 求调剂zz
[考研] 275求调剂 +7 明远求学 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-02 19:22 by zhukairuo
[考研] 欢迎采矿、地质、岩土、计算机、人工智能等专业的同学报考 +6 pin8023 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-02 17:13 by 0854蹲调剂
[考研] 0856化工专硕求调剂 +15 董boxing 2026-03-01 15/750 2026-03-02 15:06 by 晃晃不许晃
[考研] 303求调剂 +5 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-02 15:01 by 向上的胖东
[考博] 诚招农业博士 +3 心欣向荣 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-02 13:33 by 时间不狗
[考研] 求调剂 +3 熬夜的猫头鹰 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-02 11:45 by 刘兵
[考研] 材料工程专硕283求调剂 5+4 ,!? 2026-03-02 6/300 2026-03-02 11:07 by 黑!在干嘛
[考研] 一志愿郑大材料学硕298分,求调剂 +6 wsl111 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-02 11:00 by ydudjddnd
[考研] 材料学调剂 +10 提神豆沙包 2026-02-28 12/600 2026-03-02 09:26 by 李老师!
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +11 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 14/700 2026-03-02 08:46 by 聪明的大松鼠
[考研] 322求调剂 +3 熊境喆 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-02 08:44 by houyaoxu
[基金申请] 本子写完了,给DS兄弟看了,得了92分 +3 Doma 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-02 00:00 by jnzsy
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +4 麻辣鱿鱼 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 16:51 by caszguilin
[考研] 313求调剂 +3 水流年lc 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-01 16:01 by 新能源达人
[考研] 295复试调剂 +3 简木ChuFront 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 14:27 by zzxw520th
[论文投稿] Optics letters投稿被拒求助 30+3 luckyry 2026-02-26 4/200 2026-03-01 09:06 by babero
信息提示
请填处理意见