| 查看: 3686 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
botar木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
Surface and Coatings Technology 外审意见 major revision 帮我看看有希望不？
|
||
|
我因年龄家庭负担原因，选择在本单位在职读博，三年了，几乎是一个人的战斗，从还没有一篇SCI，2011-2013，两年多里投了五次稿，直接被拒掉四次，这次给了一个大修。请前辈们给把把脉，这些修改意见修改后有没有接受的希望？谢谢！祝大家新年快乐！ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dear Dr. **, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. Followling the advice of reviewer 2 I was considering to reject and recommend another journal. I still would like to encourage you to consider that option. Otherwise, please provide solid answers to the reviewers remarks. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. THE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE HIGHLIGTHED IN COLOUR THROUGH THE TEXT OF THE REVISED MANUSCRIPT. You are expected to return your Revision by 10 May 2013. Yours sincerely, Surface and Coatings Technology Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Comments to Author: two minor revisions are suggested 1. In page 5, para 2, there is a sudden appearance of word 'prickly ball'; I understand it is for the undissolved Cr3C2 carbide, but there is no mention about it in the test to confirm that what author meant as 'prickly ball' is the partially dissoved Cr3C2 2. The conclusion appears to be reproduction of the results; it is not 'concluding' your work. It can be rewritten with more impact so the 'conclusions' are clear and obvious. Reviewer #2: This is formally well written work with good thermodynamics analysis. However, in my opinion this work is not in the main scope of present journal. There is no novelty in the experimental part and thermodynamics analysis would better pass in some other journal like Materials Chemistry and Physics. I could not see the connection between experimental and theoretical investigations. * Highlights and conclusions do not make clear the novelty of this research. Highlight 1 and 4 bring the same information. * I can't agree with conclusions part in the introduction. Formation of M7C3 carbides in Fe-based matrixes is well known process, also industrially established for more than 30 years. * It is also not clear what is the link between calculations and experimental observations? How the dissolving of Cr3C2 does influence the nucleation behaviour? General remarks: * What was the vol. % of Cr3C2 powder in relation to matrix FeCrNiBSi powder? * I would not name Cr3C2 as "substrate", maybe a "source". Usually in coatings "substrate" means a base material to be coated. * Which way were the powders deposited - pasta, mixed together or separately? * If the main idea of this research was to analyse formation of M7C3 from Cr3C2 I would suggest to use pure Ni or Fe as matrix and to look on a simple system. By the used matrix composition high amount alloying elements influences the reaction processes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0854复试调剂 276
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎采矿、地质、岩土、计算机、人工智能等专业的同学报考
已经有6人回复
-
0857调剂
已经有5人回复
-
279求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料复试调剂
已经有4人回复
-
本子写完了，给DS兄弟看了，得了92分
已经有7人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料学硕318求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
一志愿郑大材料学硕298分，求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求问吉凶--关于major revision--Soil dynamics and earnthquake engineering
已经有6人回复
- 关于Major Revision for Reconsideration，求帮助！！！
已经有13人回复
- Information technology journal 关于外审意见问题，焦急啊！！！！！！
已经有26人回复
- 8月等待二审（major revision）和三审(minor revision)回复的日子，难熬啊
已经有15人回复
- 审稿意见是“accept after major revision ”，录用的可能性多大？修改时要注意什么？
已经有17人回复
- 专家们，帮忙看看“FCT审稿意见”（Major revision），有希望中不
已经有13人回复
- major revision完事后，几天能收到意见~
已经有23人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- 外审意见回来了，应该是major revise。想让大家看看，有多大机会录用
已经有29人回复
- 第一次投稿一个月收到major revision，请大家帮我看看接受几率大吗
已经有9人回复
- Chemosphere Major Revision是不是更改后要重新审稿？
已经有18人回复
- major revision后是不是还需要重新外审？
已经有11人回复
- 一篇文章major revision后，审稿意见已经回来1周了，还是没有消息
已经有23人回复
- Major revision and reconsideration还有希望吗？
已经有5人回复
- food composition and analysis---MAJOR revision后4个月接收
已经有16人回复
- 邮件是minor revision 。状态栏显示major revision and resubmit。有希望吗？
已经有32人回复
botar4楼2013-02-09 13:59:02
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-02-09 11:33:12
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2013-02-09 12:17:42
huanggq
木虫 (著名写手)
太极鱼
- 应助: 475 (硕士)
- 金币: 2889.7
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1528
- 在线: 105小时
- 虫号: 649601
- 注册: 2008-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 农学基础
5楼2013-02-09 16:25:10
