24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4259  |  回复: 20
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] Surface and Coatings Technology 外审意见 major revision 帮我看看有希望不?

我因年龄家庭负担原因,选择在本单位在职读博,三年了,几乎是一个人的战斗,从还没有一篇SCI,2011-2013,两年多里投了五次稿,直接被拒掉四次,这次给了一个大修。请前辈们给把把脉,这些修改意见修改后有没有接受的希望?谢谢!祝大家新年快乐!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dear Dr. **,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper.
Followling the advice of reviewer 2 I was considering to reject and recommend another journal. I still would like to encourage you to consider that option. Otherwise, please provide solid answers to the reviewers remarks.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. THE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE HIGHLIGTHED IN COLOUR THROUGH THE TEXT OF THE REVISED MANUSCRIPT.

You are expected to return your Revision by 10 May 2013.

Yours sincerely,

Surface and Coatings Technology

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1:
Comments to Author:  

two minor revisions are suggested

1. In page 5, para 2, there is a sudden appearance of word 'prickly ball'; I understand it is for the undissolved Cr3C2 carbide, but there is no mention about it in the test to confirm that what author meant as 'prickly ball' is the partially dissoved Cr3C2

2. The conclusion appears to be reproduction of the results; it is not 'concluding' your work. It can be rewritten with more impact so the 'conclusions' are clear and obvious.

Reviewer #2: This is formally well written work with good thermodynamics analysis. However, in my opinion this work is not in the main scope of present journal. There is no novelty in the experimental part and thermodynamics analysis would better pass in some other journal like Materials Chemistry and Physics. I could not see the connection between experimental and theoretical investigations.


*        Highlights and conclusions do not make clear the novelty of this research. Highlight 1 and 4 bring the same information.
*        I can't agree with conclusions part in the introduction. Formation of M7C3 carbides in Fe-based matrixes is well known process, also industrially established for more than 30 years.
*        It is also not clear what is the link between calculations and experimental observations? How the dissolving of Cr3C2 does influence the nucleation behaviour?

General remarks:
*        What was the vol. % of Cr3C2 powder in relation to matrix FeCrNiBSi powder?
*        I would not name Cr3C2 as "substrate", maybe a "source". Usually in coatings "substrate" means a base material to be coated.
*        Which way were the powders deposited - pasta, mixed together or separately?
*        If the main idea of this research was to analyse formation of M7C3 from Cr3C2 I would suggest to use pure Ni or Fe as matrix and to look on a simple system. By the used matrix composition high amount alloying elements influences the reaction processes.
回复此楼
努力,唯有努力。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

botar

木虫 (正式写手)

送鲜花一朵
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by huanggq at 2013-02-09 16:25:10
修改后接收的希望比较大
认真修改
祝好运

谢谢,新年快乐!
努力,唯有努力。
11楼2013-02-09 19:09:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 21 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
多数论文都是修改后才能录用的。好好修改,希望很大。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

2楼2013-02-09 11:33:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
botar: 金币+5 2013-02-09 22:02:22
第一个审稿人给了小修,第二个审稿人认为工作做得不错,但与期刊的专业偏好不符,建议改投。如果楼主能够令人信服地回答审稿人特别是第二个审稿人的意见,证明文章与期刊专业偏好契合,而且做出到位的修改,接收的希望还是很大的。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

咱也是有组织的人了...
3楼2013-02-09 12:17:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

4楼2013-02-09 13:59:02
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +6 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 9/450 2026-08-31 01:16 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +7 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 9/450 2026-08-31 01:15 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +5 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-31 01:07 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 8/400 2026-08-31 00:45 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考博] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 00:21 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 15/750 2026-08-31 00:10 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +5 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 9/450 2026-08-30 22:23 by 余韵清
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +4 echo8914667 2026-08-30 5/250 2026-08-30 21:11 by echo8914667
[考博] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 19:13 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +5 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 18:29 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 17:47 by hZiFeudZyoGR
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +8 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-30 11:40 by l0VvVHGBGRLv
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
信息提示
请填处理意见