应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 投Energy &Fuels 编辑的拒信，大家看看还有戏吗？
51/1返回列表
查看: 2424  |  回复: 7
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chwhaz

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投Energy &Fuels 编辑的拒信，大家看看还有戏吗？

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels.  I understand from my preliminary reading that you have devised and tested a novel catalyst for the title reaction.] However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address a point that I am certain will concern the reviewers and two points that our policies now require of all contributions in this topical area.


Next, I must ask you to report the conversion data as reaction rates, normalized by the number of ostensible catalytic sites (i.e., as turnover rates). Preferably, the kinetics results would be captured as rate equations in which the Arrhenius parameters (normalized pre-exponential factor, apparent activation energy) could be compared with those expected from the likely rate determining step and with those obtained in other laboratories. Presumably you are exploiting the acidity of the zeolites but the results may track better with the metal function you have added. In either case, a normalization will assist the readers.

Finally, because you have studied catalysts in liquid phase, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of internal mass transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice. Either test will require that you prepare catalysts with different loadings and then demonstrate that the normalized reaction rates are independent of loading.

You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be readily compared across laboratories and that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena.

I am obliged to formally reject this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. If you continue to consider that Energy & Fuels can provide your work with an attentive audience then, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full we would be willing to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly.

这篇文章主要并不是做什么动力学上的问题，但是编辑好像就盯着动力学上的事情在看，而且我们的实验设备也是批式反应（反应釜），也不能做动力学上的分析。

请问大家，如果我太想补实验，然后直接回复他，会不会很容易被拒啊？
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-12-29 21:42:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jyj928

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 马小莫 at 2015-04-05 09:44:56
楼主 ，我也遇到这样的问题了，编辑给的信基本看和你的一样，你最后是怎么解决的？万分感谢呀！

你好，我也遇到一样的问题了，编辑的问题完全一样，请问你是怎么解决的啊最后，急求，谢谢
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2016-12-13 10:45:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+1 2012-12-30 22:41:21
因为是编辑直接的意见，所以如果你能照做，就重投；不然就另投。
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2012-12-30 10:17:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (职业作家)
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+1 2012-12-30 22:41:14
本帖仅楼主可见
赞一下
3楼2012-12-30 10:21:16
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+3 2012-12-30 22:41:06
3 楼的意见很具体~~也很实在~
2 楼的话很直接~
我建议~
楼主先想办法写一篇好的 aure 信给 editor~
跟他沟通一下~你的 "这篇文章主要并不是做什么动力学上的问题，但是编辑好像就盯着动力学上的事情在看，而且我们的实验设备也是批式反应（反应釜），也不能做动力学上的分析。" 这个问题~
说服不成~
不是照 2,3 楼意见重投原处~就是改投它处了~
赞一下 回复此楼
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
4楼2012-12-30 18:40:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭