24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3015  |  回复: 7

chwhaz

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投Energy &Fuels 编辑的拒信,大家看看还有戏吗?

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels.  I understand from my preliminary reading that you have devised and tested a novel catalyst for the title reaction.] However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address a point that I am certain will concern the reviewers and two points that our policies now require of all contributions in this topical area.


Next, I must ask you to report the conversion data as reaction rates, normalized by the number of ostensible catalytic sites (i.e., as turnover rates). Preferably, the kinetics results would be captured as rate equations in which the Arrhenius parameters (normalized pre-exponential factor, apparent activation energy) could be compared with those expected from the likely rate determining step and with those obtained in other laboratories. Presumably you are exploiting the acidity of the zeolites but the results may track better with the metal function you have added. In either case, a normalization will assist the readers.

Finally, because you have studied catalysts in liquid phase, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of internal mass transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice. Either test will require that you prepare catalysts with different loadings and then demonstrate that the normalized reaction rates are independent of loading.

You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be readily compared across laboratories and that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena.

I am obliged to formally reject this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. If you continue to consider that Energy & Fuels can provide your work with an attentive audience then, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full we would be willing to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly.

这篇文章主要并不是做什么动力学上的问题,但是编辑好像就盯着动力学上的事情在看,而且我们的实验设备也是批式反应(反应釜),也不能做动力学上的分析。

请问大家,如果我太想补实验,然后直接回复他,会不会很容易被拒啊?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+1 2012-12-30 22:41:21
因为是编辑直接的意见,所以如果你能照做,就重投;不然就另投。
2楼2012-12-30 10:17:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (职业作家)



感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+1 2012-12-30 22:41:14
本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2012-12-30 10:21:16
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chwhaz: 金币+3 2012-12-30 22:41:06
3 楼的意见很具体~~也很实在~
2 楼的话很直接~
我建议~
楼主先想办法写一篇好的 aure 信给 editor~
跟他沟通一下~你的 "这篇文章主要并不是做什么动力学上的问题,但是编辑好像就盯着动力学上的事情在看,而且我们的实验设备也是批式反应(反应釜),也不能做动力学上的分析。" 这个问题~
说服不成~
不是照 2,3 楼意见重投原处~就是改投它处了~
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
4楼2012-12-30 18:40:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
祝福
5楼2013-03-21 13:47:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

马小莫

新虫 (初入文坛)

楼主 ,我也遇到这样的问题了,编辑给的信基本看和你的一样,你最后是怎么解决的?万分感谢呀!
6楼2015-04-05 09:44:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jyj928

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 马小莫 at 2015-04-05 09:44:56
楼主 ,我也遇到这样的问题了,编辑给的信基本看和你的一样,你最后是怎么解决的?万分感谢呀!

你好,我也遇到一样的问题了,编辑的问题完全一样,请问你是怎么解决的啊最后,急求,谢谢
7楼2016-12-13 10:45:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jyj928

新虫 (小有名气)

楼主 ,我也遇到这样的问题了,编辑给的信基本看和你的一样,你最后是怎么解决的?万分感谢呀!
8楼2016-12-13 10:47:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chwhaz 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +10 kulium 2026-08-21 12/600 2026-08-21 19:46 by kulium
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +16 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 17/850 2026-08-21 19:07 by sakuraai
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +15 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 18:54 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +11 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 16:51 by applepetty
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +7 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 7/350 2026-08-21 14:13 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +23 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 25/1250 2026-08-21 12:19 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +7 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 7/350 2026-08-21 12:15 by weiyin
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +15 archvillain 2026-08-15 27/1350 2026-08-21 11:32 by tim76
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +10 zju2000 2026-08-16 11/550 2026-08-20 20:02 by cl479861084
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +14 布布和一二 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-19 18:07 by gltch
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +4 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 10/500 2026-08-19 11:02 by wanfengnew
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +4 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 5/250 2026-08-18 00:49 by 蔡棒棒菂
信息提示
请填处理意见