应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 求助完结 » CC 审稿人意见回复求助~~
31/1返回列表
查看: 920  |  回复: 2
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

YICO17

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] CC 审稿人意见回复求助~~

第二个审稿人最后这个问题我不知道该怎么回答啊，好像看到小木虫上有人有类似的小修，说补充一个XXX会更好，然后那位虫友回复说：提的很好啊~我下一步工作计划就是这么进行的。。。然后悲剧了。。。。。。

The authors think that graphene/MWCNT in this article formed special-designed 3D network and had a unique structure, which is responsible for the significantly improved mechanical and electrical properties of the composites. How does the authors think about the dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of the above composites? I think it would be better if the authors supplement dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of the graphene/MWCNT aerogel polymer (PDMS) composite films in their further work in order to further confirm the formation of the unique 3D network structure and to confirm the stability of the network structure.Overall, the research work produces useful information for developing highly conductive polymer composites.

审稿人总体上对稿件的评价是比较好的，我这个结构对复合材料的电性能和机械性能有提高，审稿人推测是做聚合物的，所以对DMA和热导率测试比较感兴趣，所以提议做一个这个测试，这个应该是他认为以后的工作可以考虑一下。我该怎么回复能表达出我对审稿人的提议觉得非常的好，我很感兴趣，但是我就是不补这个数据咧？各位虫友能给我点英语描述帮助吗？拜谢~！

这个是小修，所以更加肯定应该是不会要补这个数据了（在虫友的帮助下肯定的。。。）
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-12-12 09:32:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
YICO17: 金币+10, ★有帮助 2012-12-13 08:54:28
I think it would be better if the authors supplement dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of the graphene/MWCNT aerogel polymer (PDMS) composite films     

     in their further work in order to further confirm        

the formation of the unique 3D network structure and to confirm the stability of the network structure.Overall, the research work produces useful information for developing highly conductive polymer composites.

reviewer已经说了在你们以后的工作中再去确认的 in their further work in order to further confirm   
所以你没必要担心了，不过还是建议你回复
“Many thanks for your good suggestions and pointing out this. We totally agree that the investigation on dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity is helpful to confirm the formation of the structure and the stability of the network structure of our graphene/MWCNT aerogel polymer (PDMS) composite. And indeed, the investigation on dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity is in our following plan. It is our pleasure to provide the comprehensive investigation of this PDMS composite to our readers."
赞一下 回复此楼
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
2楼2012-12-12 09:55:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

YICO17

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by googleuboy at 2012-12-12 09:55:35
I think it would be better if the authors supplement dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of the graphene/MWCNT aerogel polymer (PDMS) composite films     

     in their further  ...

非常感谢诶~~
能不能把And indeed, the investigation on dynamic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity is in our following plan.这句话再换个说法咧？感觉写出来是following plan，编辑看了会有点不乐意，干嘛不这次就全部表征完说明完，还留了一手给下一次
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-12-13 08:56:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 YICO17 的主题更新
31/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭