| 查看: 791 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
wjlwyk新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请高人帮我修改
|
|
|
Dear editor We are confused with the opinions given by the the referee (only one?) on our paper numbered STAPRO-D-12-00249. First of all, we can not see HOW the conclusions in our paper can be followed imidiatly by any references the referee listed as his or her main opinoin, as a matter of fact, as far as we can see, those reference articles seem to have no tight connections with our conclusions at all, for example, we didn't discuss the variance of sample median (but the referee gave us two reference articles on the variances of sapmle medians), we discussed mainly the variance of sample midrange which is rarely discussed by schlars, It seems that the referee might draw his or her critical conclusions hurriedly. Secondly, as you can see, the asymptotic independence conclusion is not our main conclusion, we prove it in detail in order to make our paper easy for referees. We don't understand why the referee used the same method as we applied in our paper to prove the asymptotic independence too. We thank the referee for his findings of some of our misspellings, But, the key mistake, the definition of left bound 'a' in our paper was strangely not found. Moreover, we wonder if there should be a word 'to' in the referee's opinion '... in order give proofs of such lemmas'. We mistakenly think that the 'letter' type of journals might publish an article very soon if it is accepted, we are astonished to see that our paper needs half a year for a decision while the opinion drawn by the referee seems to be in a hurry way. Yes, we are not patient enough for a decision, maybe this is the reason. After all, we will not try to publish our articles on your journal. NEVER!!! We fill hurt at the referee's attitude. > >Yours sincerely, >*** |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- office2007公式编辑器的问题
已经有28人回复
- 请教高人如何帮我修改错误~~~
已经有9人回复
- 求 摘要 引言 结论翻译 （我已经自己翻译了一遍，希望高人帮忙修改一下）
已经有1人回复
- 论文被退回，说是英文水平达不到要求，求助高人哪里有较好的论文修改公司？
已经有9人回复
- 如何自己修改文章，请高手赐教！
已经有24人回复
- 【求助】杂质峰出现在2-3分钟之间，梯度改变，保留时间还在2-3分，请高人指教.
已经有8人回复
- 被OE拒了，可否修改后重投？请高人指点。
已经有32人回复
- 【求助】求将c语言改写为C++，求教高人啊！
已经有6人回复
- 主编让改成short communication， 那修改信应该怎么写，望高人指导，急·······
已经有13人回复
- 急！修改中译英，我已经翻译了，请各位高手帮忙修改下。
已经有4人回复
- 修改中译英翻译。急用！请高手帮帮忙
已经有1人回复
- 【求助】求高人帮我修改程序
已经有5人回复
- 【在线答疑】关于NAMD/VMD
已经有210人回复
wjlwyk
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1595.4
- 散金: 45
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 1602919
- 注册: 2012-02-06
- 专业: 数理统计
7楼2012-09-02 11:39:28
独步青云
新虫 (职业作家)
术中小生
- 应助: 894 (博后)
- 金币: 2993.1
- 散金: 3834
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 3587
- 在线: 241.8小时
- 虫号: 339818
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药质量评价
2楼2012-09-01 23:02:33
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2012-09-01 23:55:56
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
4楼2012-09-02 00:01:15
10