应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 其他 » 请高人帮我修改
51/1返回列表
查看: 674  |  回复: 7
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wjlwyk

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请高人帮我修改

Dear editor
We are confused with the opinions given by the the referee (only one?) on our paper numbered STAPRO-D-12-00249.
First of all, we can not see HOW the conclusions in our paper can be followed imidiatly by any references the referee listed as his or her main opinoin, as a matter of fact, as far as we can see, those reference articles seem to have no tight connections with our conclusions at all, for example, we didn't discuss the variance of sample median (but the referee gave us two reference articles on the variances of sapmle medians), we discussed mainly the variance of sample midrange which is rarely discussed by schlars, It seems that the referee might draw his or her critical conclusions hurriedly.
Secondly, as you can see, the asymptotic independence conclusion is not our main conclusion, we prove it in detail in order to make our paper easy for referees. We don't understand why the referee used the same method as we applied in our paper to prove the asymptotic independence too.
We thank the referee for his findings of some of our misspellings, But, the key mistake, the definition of left bound 'a' in our paper was strangely not found.
Moreover, we wonder if there should be a word 'to' in the referee's opinion '... in order give proofs of such lemmas'.
We mistakenly think that the 'letter' type of journals might publish an article very soon if it is accepted, we are astonished to see that our paper needs half a year for a decision while the opinion drawn by the referee seems to be in a hurry way.
Yes, we are not patient enough for a decision, maybe this is the reason.
After all, we will not try to publish our articles on your journal. NEVER!!! We fill hurt at the referee's attitude.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>***
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2012-09-01 19:35:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2012-09-01 23:02:33
你这什么都没有问，修改什么？哪有这么好的事啊

对，这像是申述，又像就算抱怨。应该是文章写得不清楚，审稿人提了些问题。。。编辑拒了没有？没有的话，就尽量修改，客气回答。

抱怨的话，letter杂志不是都是快的杂志，一般文字短。审稿时间，数学类一年都不少，半年不算慢了。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-09-01 23:55:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
你这什么都没有问，修改什么？哪有这么好的事啊
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2012-09-01 23:02:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

楼主是不是催稿后被拒？这样的事比较常见，不是非常好的文章，编辑可以说一些极端的话，拒掉算了。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-09-02 00:01:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
agree above especially visitor958 said.
赞一下 回复此楼
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
5楼2012-09-02 00:05:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭