24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2026级博士研究生招生报考通知(长期有效)
查看: 1838  |  回复: 13

wangdongwind

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 帮我看看我文章的状态 咋回事?

我投稿Optical engineering一文章 现在是大修稿件头上去的状态 疑惑为啥有两次Contacting Potential Reviewers!不是我的文章要悲剧了吗???


Under Review 2012-05-29 11:04:50
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-05-29 11:04:31
Under Review 2012-05-23 21:55:16
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-05-23 12:55:02
Potential Reviewers Assigned 2012-05-23 12:54:18
Under Consideration - Associate Editor 2012-05-23 12:53:42
Under Consideration - Editor 2012-05-23 01:31:55
Author-Approved Files Submitted 2012-05-23 01:31:54
Awaiting Author Approval of Converted Files 2012-05-23 01:18:54

Revision Received 2012-05-23 01:18:24
Waiting for Revision 2012-05-07 12:28:34
Decision Sent 2012-05-07 12:28:34
Decision Letter Being Prepared 2012-05-07 06:03:56
Under Review 2012-04-16 23:34:02
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-04-16 17:27:34
Potential Reviewers Assigned 2012-04-14 01:01:30
Under Consideration - Associate Editor 2012-04-10 16:57:49
Under Consideration - Editor 2012-04-08 04:59:48
Author-Approved Files Submitted 2012-04-08 04:59:48
Manuscript Files Uploaded
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

啸天犬

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
可能是第一次联系的人没有接收审稿吧?或者又找了一个审稿人。没说明什么啊,等消息吧,不一定就是坏消息
天下兴亡,我的责任!
2楼2012-05-30 18:33:55
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

制冷与低温

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
貌似是修改稿啊,估计快接受了 放心吧~
4楼2012-05-30 18:57:24
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yanwuliaorao

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
貌似没有什么异常啊。祝楼主好运!
阳光总在风雨后!
7楼2012-05-30 20:07:34
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sculhf

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

断翼天使

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
希望很大
很快就会有结果了
谋事在人成事在天
8楼2012-05-30 20:13:46
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mpcctv

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

Peter

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
很快就有结果了 放心等等吧
successhasmanyfathers,butfailureisanorphan.ifyoufailtoplan,thenyouplantofail
9楼2012-05-30 20:48:26
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

wangdongwind

金虫 (正式写手)

不是应该返给 原来的reviewers ,啊吗 还重新找人啊 完了 不同的人 对我大修后的稿子 不利 啊 不知道 回事啥样的结果了。。。。  忐忑中啊。。。
3楼2012-05-30 18:50:51
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangdongwind

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 制冷与低温 at 2012-05-30 18:57:24
貌似是修改稿啊,估计快接受了 放心吧~

谢谢你的吉言
5楼2012-05-30 19:07:41
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangdongwind

金虫 (正式写手)

有相同经历的人吗?? 帮忙看看啊
6楼2012-05-30 20:02:25
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangdongwind

金虫 (正式写手)

疑惑的是我的大修稿子 编辑是返回给 原来的来的两个reviewer了,啊吗
这里附上一审结果
Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Appropriateness for OE: Satisfactory
Quality of writing: Satisfactory
Clarity: Satisfactory
Conciseness: Marginal
References to literature: Good
Relevance of figures: Good
Originality: Marginal
Significance of results: Marginal
Technical accuracy of results: Satisfactory
Rigor: Satisfactory
Detail level of procedures: Good
Substantiation of conclusions: Poor

Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required):

The authors propose an iterative algorithm for designing a phase element which will be applied to beam shape the TEM00 mode laser beam into the expected diameter or shape flat-top intensity profile laser beam in the far-field, with a low mean square error and a high diffraction efficiency. The authors coin their algorithm as adaptive weight FFT-based iterative algorithm (AWFFT-IA). In this algorithm, the initial phase distribution for the first time iteration is coded by pseudo-random coding technique (to avoid falling into local minima which leads to a local stagnation) while the far-field amplitude for the IFFT is adaptively modified during each iteration by using an optimized weight strategy. Some of this is not new by the way as the authors themselves indicate in the introduction.

Although the paper contains some novelty, the authors failed in convincing the general reader in the added value that their technique has to offer. The paper might be suitable for publication however a major revision and a re-review are needed in order to better convince the reader in the added value existing in the proposed concept. Although their approach may avoid the iterations from being stuck in local stagnations, nevertheless, the computation of the c coefficient for the AWFFT-IA significantly increases the computational load and complexity and thus it is not clear if this additional computational load cannot be used in a more straight forward manner of examining all possible options for the optimization process. In general, I think the authors did not properly compare the gain in the final performance of their approach in comparison to other available techniques. They should repeat their simulations in identical conditions for all the other competing approaches that t
hey
have mentioned in their introduction in order to better validate and demonstrate the gain they have to offer.



Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Appropriateness for OE: Good
Quality of writing: Good
Clarity: No Comment
Conciseness: Good
References to literature: Good
Relevance of figures: Good
Originality: Satisfactory
Significance of results: Satisfactory
Technical accuracy of results: Good
Rigor: Satisfactory
Detail level of procedures: Good
Substantiation of conclusions: Good

Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required):

The paper is well written and the authors present an interesting new approach, an adaptive weight FFT-based iterative algorithm (AWFFT-IA) for flat-top laser beam shaping. The paper is of interest for the readers of OE and will certainly inspire other researchers to follow this approach.
Comments: 1) If you introduce a "AWFFT-IA" algorithm it makes sense to mention and explain the name also in the abstract and conclusion. 2) Saving computer time for calculation is not really the figure of merit in 2012 and typically everybody wants to have a flat-top with 98% efficiency, no 0th order problem and no straylight outside the flat-top. This should be considered - at least if you intend to continue to further improve AWFFT-IA and test it in experiment.
10楼2012-05-30 21:09:21
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wangdongwind 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见