| 查看: 2464 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wangdongwind金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
帮我看看我文章的状态 咋回事？
|
||
|
我投稿Optical engineering一文章 现在是大修稿件头上去的状态 疑惑为啥有两次Contacting Potential Reviewers！不是我的文章要悲剧了吗？？？ Under Review 2012-05-29 11:04:50 Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-05-29 11:04:31 Under Review 2012-05-23 21:55:16 Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-05-23 12:55:02 Potential Reviewers Assigned 2012-05-23 12:54:18 Under Consideration - Associate Editor 2012-05-23 12:53:42 Under Consideration - Editor 2012-05-23 01:31:55 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2012-05-23 01:31:54 Awaiting Author Approval of Converted Files 2012-05-23 01:18:54 Revision Received 2012-05-23 01:18:24 Waiting for Revision 2012-05-07 12:28:34 Decision Sent 2012-05-07 12:28:34 Decision Letter Being Prepared 2012-05-07 06:03:56 Under Review 2012-04-16 23:34:02 Contacting Potential Reviewers 2012-04-16 17:27:34 Potential Reviewers Assigned 2012-04-14 01:01:30 Under Consideration - Associate Editor 2012-04-10 16:57:49 Under Consideration - Editor 2012-04-08 04:59:48 Author-Approved Files Submitted 2012-04-08 04:59:48 Manuscript Files Uploaded |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有13人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有20人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有18人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有19人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有14人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有13人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 谁能帮我看看这个胶是怎么回事啊?
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮我看看这是怎么回事？？谢谢啦。
已经有3人回复
- 第一次写文章，大家帮我看看这种情况能不能发表
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮我看下测出这种磁滞回线是怎么回事
已经有25人回复
- 请大家帮我看看我的电猫怎么回事
已经有4人回复
- 爬板碰到个奇怪的事 大家帮我看看怎么回事
已经有21人回复
- 【问题求助】说说我的心里状态，大家帮我看看是不是该去看心理医生了？
已经有28人回复
- 【求助/交流】请大家帮我看看是怎么回事？
已经有5人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】【求助】大家帮我看看，这是怎么回事？推荐信~~~~
已经有8人回复
- Talanta文章被拒，但请各位帮我看看这样的审稿意见是什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 【求助】大家帮我看看是怎么回事
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】大家帮我看看，我的电滞回线是这个样子的，是怎么回事啊？
已经有15人回复
wangdongwind
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 23 (小学生)
- 金币: 734.8
- 散金: 139
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 306
- 在线: 245.7小时
- 虫号: 1827724
- 注册: 2012-05-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学信息获取与处理
|
疑惑的是我的大修稿子 编辑是返回给 原来的来的两个reviewer了，啊吗 这里附上一审结果 Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Satisfactory Quality of writing: Satisfactory Clarity: Satisfactory Conciseness: Marginal References to literature: Good Relevance of figures: Good Originality: Marginal Significance of results: Marginal Technical accuracy of results: Satisfactory Rigor: Satisfactory Detail level of procedures: Good Substantiation of conclusions: Poor Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required): The authors propose an iterative algorithm for designing a phase element which will be applied to beam shape the TEM00 mode laser beam into the expected diameter or shape flat-top intensity profile laser beam in the far-field, with a low mean square error and a high diffraction efficiency. The authors coin their algorithm as adaptive weight FFT-based iterative algorithm (AWFFT-IA). In this algorithm, the initial phase distribution for the first time iteration is coded by pseudo-random coding technique (to avoid falling into local minima which leads to a local stagnation) while the far-field amplitude for the IFFT is adaptively modified during each iteration by using an optimized weight strategy. Some of this is not new by the way as the authors themselves indicate in the introduction. Although the paper contains some novelty, the authors failed in convincing the general reader in the added value that their technique has to offer. The paper might be suitable for publication however a major revision and a re-review are needed in order to better convince the reader in the added value existing in the proposed concept. Although their approach may avoid the iterations from being stuck in local stagnations, nevertheless, the computation of the c coefficient for the AWFFT-IA significantly increases the computational load and complexity and thus it is not clear if this additional computational load cannot be used in a more straight forward manner of examining all possible options for the optimization process. In general, I think the authors did not properly compare the gain in the final performance of their approach in comparison to other available techniques. They should repeat their simulations in identical conditions for all the other competing approaches that t hey have mentioned in their introduction in order to better validate and demonstrate the gain they have to offer. Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Good Quality of writing: Good Clarity: No Comment Conciseness: Good References to literature: Good Relevance of figures: Good Originality: Satisfactory Significance of results: Satisfactory Technical accuracy of results: Good Rigor: Satisfactory Detail level of procedures: Good Substantiation of conclusions: Good Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required): The paper is well written and the authors present an interesting new approach, an adaptive weight FFT-based iterative algorithm (AWFFT-IA) for flat-top laser beam shaping. The paper is of interest for the readers of OE and will certainly inspire other researchers to follow this approach. Comments: 1) If you introduce a "AWFFT-IA" algorithm it makes sense to mention and explain the name also in the abstract and conclusion. 2) Saving computer time for calculation is not really the figure of merit in 2012 and typically everybody wants to have a flat-top with 98% efficiency, no 0th order problem and no straylight outside the flat-top. This should be considered - at least if you intend to continue to further improve AWFFT-IA and test it in experiment. |
10楼2012-05-30 21:09:21
啸天犬
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2171 (讲师)
- 金币: 9715.1
- 红花: 45
- 帖子: 3962
- 在线: 302.2小时
- 虫号: 1362468
- 注册: 2011-08-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文地质学(含地热地质学)
2楼2012-05-30 18:33:55
wangdongwind
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 23 (小学生)
- 金币: 734.8
- 散金: 139
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 306
- 在线: 245.7小时
- 虫号: 1827724
- 注册: 2012-05-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学信息获取与处理
3楼2012-05-30 18:50:51
4楼2012-05-30 18:57:24
