24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 362  |  回复: 2

nx8011

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 收到大修的意见,有些看不太懂,请大家帮忙看一下哈,谢谢了。

收到大修的意见,有些看不太懂,请大家帮忙看一下哈,谢谢了。
Reviewer #1:
1、In general, it is important that a paper can 'stand alone' i.e. can be understood without the need to also read other papers to be able to find out what was done. This manuscript is not sufficiently detailed in the Methods section to enable the reader to do this easily.
2、The explanation of the mechanism for resistance development (via residue bioaccumulation) is incorrect for an ectoparasite. Care is needed when suggesting that resistance will not develop to a botanical insecticides - why not?
3、Figs 1 and 2 presumably are showing the infection in the right ear? In Tables 2 and 3 its not clear what the numbers in brackets are and I don't think you need to distinguish 'significant' from 'very significant'。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hanyuabc

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
nx8011: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案, thanks 2012-05-24 15:18:27
1、实验方法写的不够详细,不能让人家明白你是怎么做的;
2、质疑你的机理解释有误;
3、图1和图2是要阐述右耳受到感染么?(你连图要表达什么意思都没让人理解啊······)表2和3中方括号中的数字是啥意思?还有“significant”与“'very significant”没什么区别,significant本来就有极其的程度了,别再加very了········
2楼2012-05-24 15:10:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nx8011

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by hanyuabc at 2012-05-24 15:10:52:
1、实验方法写的不够详细,不能让人家明白你是怎么做的;
2、质疑你的机理解释有误;
3、图1和图2是要阐述右耳受到感染么?(你连图要表达什么意思都没让人理解啊······)表2和3中方括号中的数字是啥意思?

thanks
3楼2012-05-24 15:18:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 nx8011 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见