24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2980  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tianjinzxl

木虫 (著名写手)

小学生

[求助] 补充下审稿意见,大家看看JACS申诉胜算多大??

请大家帮忙看看,这样的申诉有没有胜算。收到JACS的审稿意见,一个建议拒稿,两个建议小修后发表,最后编辑给拒了。建议拒稿的审稿人没有对实验提出质疑,不需要对实验进行补充,大都是描述、描写和写作的问题,请问这种情况是申诉还是修改后再投或改投呢???
While your work appears to have been carried out with care, unfortunately, we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to the Journal. We appreciate your choice of the Journal of the American Chemical Society as a possible forum for the presentation of your work.

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Publish elsewhere.
意见如下:
The experimental data generally supports the conclusions, the images are nice and clearly demonstrate the layers on NPs. The work indeed may have impact. Nevertheless, I am sure that in the current form this paper is not acceptable for JACS, and should be rejected. 后面就是文章的建议之类的

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions.
意见如下:This technique could be potentially important. However, the significance of this work was not well elucidated.

Reviewer: 3

Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions.

意见如下:The experiments thorough and the results appear to be novel.
回复此楼
If it's nor trying, you are not trying hard enough!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

terry_well

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

笑熬浆糊——满脑浆糊

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
tianjinzxl: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-05-07 08:53:08
the significance of this work was not well elucidated 关键是这句,一定要好好把表达改好,再申诉,表明你很重视这个期刊。应该问题不大,要执着一点。这么好的杂志高水平文章很多,关键看谁够重视,够谦虚。
签名:英文名“Terry”,EC版专用;中文名“浆糊哥”,灌水专用,谢谢合作!
14楼2012-05-07 04:41:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 tianjinzxl 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见