24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 320  |  回复: 0

zero623

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

[交流] Collaborators, Colleagues, and Friends Need Not Be Listed...(关于推荐审稿专家)

From ACS
Analytical Chemistry

You have spent the last month writing your masterpiece, describing a wonderful new approach for measuring the finest details on your favored material! Now is the time to submit the manuscript to your preferred journal—Analytical Chemistry. During the submission process, you are asked to suggest potential reviewers. At times, I have the feeling that authors spend months writing their paper but only a few minutes, at most, thinking about who to suggest as reviewers of their work.

First, let me emphasize that your suggested reviewers are important, especially for manuscripts on subjects that are out of the ordinary, and thus, consider them wisely. These names certainly help guide our selection of reviewers: we evaluate your list of reviewers, as well as suitable reviewers that we select on our own, and typically invite a combination of your suggested reviewers and ours.

So why am I writing about this? Oftentimes I am surprised at the names submitted by authors. A goal of the review process is to get an unbiased but informed opinion on the science presented in your manuscript. Thus, suggesting names of colleagues from your department or institution does not inspire confidence that these are unbiased reviewers. How can I tell if these are truly impartial experts or individuals you meet with over coffee or tea every week? Even more problematic is suggesting researchers you published with collaboratively within the last year or so. At the very least, such reviewers do not have the appearance of being unbiased, and, consequently, I tend to look at an entire list of suggestions as “biased”.

Of course, many suggested names I recognize, but some I do not. How do I proceed? I, and I assume most Editors, do a quick Internet and/or more targeted search on the unfamiliar name. I find it strange when I pull up information on suggested reviewers to find that they have vibrant research programs unrelated to the paper being considered. Although such individuals may not be biased, they also may not be experts on the manuscript’s topic. When acting as an Editor, here are a few questions I ask when trying to select suitable reviewers, which you may find helpful when making your list:

Have they published in the field related to the manuscript’s subject matter?

Are they cited in the manuscript in a meaningful way (which certainly suggests relevant expertise)?

Have they reviewed for Analytical Chemistry previously, and are their reviews of high quality?

OK, you “got me” on this one: it is not really possible for the author to know, but obviously this is information we have access to and is an important consideration in selecting appropriate reviewers.

Another thought in reviewer selection is whether or not the suggested reviewer has published in Analytical Chemistry. Often our authors are our best reviewers, although this criterion certainly has exceptions.

And let me list a final category of suggestions to avoid en masse: Nobel Laureates, National Academy members, or researchers who retired long ago. While it may be tempting to “name drop” by only suggesting such individuals, I find that they are less likely to accept given the large number of invitations they receive; thus, they should be listed judiciously.

In summary, I urge you to carefully consider your list of suggested reviewers. And remember, your friends, colleagues, and collaborators need not be listed. Your manuscript will receive a better review, and your Editor will thank you.
回复此楼

» 本帖附件资源列表

  • 欢迎监督和反馈:小木虫仅提供交流平台,不对该内容负责。
    本内容由用户自主发布,如果其内容涉及到知识产权问题,其责任在于用户本人,如对版权有异议,请联系邮箱:xiaomuchong@tal.com
  • 附件 1 : ac300956s.pdf
  • 2012-05-04 06:29:33, 89.61 K

» 猜你喜欢

已隐居山野,请不要@了~~~~~
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

智能机器人

Robot (super robot)

我们都爱小木虫

相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zero623 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[有机交流] 反应很差,大量原料没有反应 5+3 Mr.Zot 2026-05-19 8/400 2026-05-20 22:19 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 面上本子正文33页,违规吗?会被低分嘛? +11 1234567wang 2026-05-17 13/650 2026-05-20 18:55 by tanfancy
[基金申请] 评审有感 +14 popular289 2026-05-18 23/1150 2026-05-20 17:39 by lincyb
[基金申请] 提交了我也来说说感想 +6 fummck 2026-05-20 6/300 2026-05-20 17:29 by 姜太公烤鱼
[论文投稿] Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验 +6 jyang1999 2026-05-16 7/350 2026-05-20 16:39 by feng6531
[基金申请] 今年审到国自然15份,谈谈感受 +19 国自然国社科中 2026-05-17 20/1000 2026-05-20 14:14 by 仲夏夜的星星
[考博] 如果工作了想读博,可以边工作边读全日制嘛? 30+3 铁达火车 2026-05-18 5/250 2026-05-20 09:33 by tfang
[有机交流] 如何实现卤原子转化 +3 BT20230424 2026-05-15 8/400 2026-05-20 09:32 by xtlilibin
[基金申请] 河北省自然科学基金 +3 Peterchao 2026-05-18 3/150 2026-05-20 08:57 by 霸_霸
[教师之家] 上海大学实验技术岗位非升即走 +12 嘻嘻哈哈乐呵呵 2026-05-15 13/650 2026-05-20 08:34 by xli1984
[文学芳草园] 献血感触 +6 呀呀好傻 2026-05-19 11/550 2026-05-19 22:26 by 而立得乐
[基金申请] 2026山东省优青 +3 luckinging 2026-05-14 4/200 2026-05-19 16:15 by 52wls
[考博] 找博士生导师 +6 小代想上岸 2026-05-15 7/350 2026-05-19 10:22 by free_fisher
[基金申请] 同样的基金本子,换个专家直接从C变A! (金币-10) +3 国自然国社科中 2026-05-19 3/150 2026-05-19 08:50 by Equinoxhua
[考博] 2026博士还有哪些学校有名额 +7 小王求读研 2026-05-15 8/400 2026-05-19 08:27 by zhyzzh
[基金申请] 国自然上会要求 +5 无名者登山 2026-05-18 9/450 2026-05-18 17:50 by BlakeReary
[硕博家园] 我在等一个没有答案的答案 +3 Love_MH 2026-05-17 3/150 2026-05-18 02:22 by 竹林孤影
[考博] 光量子物理方向 博士招生 1人(2026.09) +3 sandyworld 2026-05-15 4/200 2026-05-17 14:38 by sandyworld
[有机交流] 求助2,4-二氯-5-嘧啶甲醛的合成方法 20+3 光吃不拉 2026-05-14 6/300 2026-05-16 19:46 by Equinoxhua
[硕博家园] 申请博士 +3 呃?呃 2026-05-15 3/150 2026-05-16 11:01 by a4742549
信息提示
请填处理意见