| 查看: 337 | 回复: 0 | |||
zero623荣誉版主 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
Collaborators, Colleagues, and Friends Need Not Be Listed...（关于推荐审稿专家）
|
|
From ACS Analytical Chemistry You have spent the last month writing your masterpiece, describing a wonderful new approach for measuring the finest details on your favored material! Now is the time to submit the manuscript to your preferred journal—Analytical Chemistry. During the submission process, you are asked to suggest potential reviewers. At times, I have the feeling that authors spend months writing their paper but only a few minutes, at most, thinking about who to suggest as reviewers of their work. First, let me emphasize that your suggested reviewers are important, especially for manuscripts on subjects that are out of the ordinary, and thus, consider them wisely. These names certainly help guide our selection of reviewers: we evaluate your list of reviewers, as well as suitable reviewers that we select on our own, and typically invite a combination of your suggested reviewers and ours. So why am I writing about this? Oftentimes I am surprised at the names submitted by authors. A goal of the review process is to get an unbiased but informed opinion on the science presented in your manuscript. Thus, suggesting names of colleagues from your department or institution does not inspire confidence that these are unbiased reviewers. How can I tell if these are truly impartial experts or individuals you meet with over coffee or tea every week? Even more problematic is suggesting researchers you published with collaboratively within the last year or so. At the very least, such reviewers do not have the appearance of being unbiased, and, consequently, I tend to look at an entire list of suggestions as “biased”. Of course, many suggested names I recognize, but some I do not. How do I proceed? I, and I assume most Editors, do a quick Internet and/or more targeted search on the unfamiliar name. I find it strange when I pull up information on suggested reviewers to find that they have vibrant research programs unrelated to the paper being considered. Although such individuals may not be biased, they also may not be experts on the manuscript’s topic. When acting as an Editor, here are a few questions I ask when trying to select suitable reviewers, which you may find helpful when making your list: Have they published in the field related to the manuscript’s subject matter? Are they cited in the manuscript in a meaningful way (which certainly suggests relevant expertise)? Have they reviewed for Analytical Chemistry previously, and are their reviews of high quality? OK, you “got me” on this one: it is not really possible for the author to know, but obviously this is information we have access to and is an important consideration in selecting appropriate reviewers. Another thought in reviewer selection is whether or not the suggested reviewer has published in Analytical Chemistry. Often our authors are our best reviewers, although this criterion certainly has exceptions. And let me list a final category of suggestions to avoid en masse: Nobel Laureates, National Academy members, or researchers who retired long ago. While it may be tempting to “name drop” by only suggesting such individuals, I find that they are less likely to accept given the large number of invitations they receive; thus, they should be listed judiciously. In summary, I urge you to carefully consider your list of suggested reviewers. And remember, your friends, colleagues, and collaborators need not be listed. Your manuscript will receive a better review, and your Editor will thank you. |
回复此楼» 本帖附件资源列表
-
欢迎监督和反馈：小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。
本内容由用户自主发布，如果其内容涉及到知识产权问题，其责任在于用户本人，如对版权有异议，请联系邮箱：xiaomuchong@tal.com - 附件 1 : ac300956s.pdf
2012-05-04 06:29:33, 89.61 K
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有4人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有10人回复
找到一些相关的精华帖子，希望有用哦~
Energetic graphene oxide: Challenges and opportunities
已经有49人回复
- my first time to be here！
已经有10人回复
- Ebook__《Antibiotic Resistance》
已经有16人回复
- 胶黏剂专业书籍 Engineering_and_Structural_Adhesives【转载】
已经有53人回复
- Ab Initio modelling of structural and electronic properties of semiconductors
已经有111人回复
- What should my cover letter say and how long should it be?
已经有11人回复
- Computational and Theoretical Chemistry (原Theochem)投稿状态
已经有4人回复
- 求助Materials and design 杂志的 keyword list？
已经有3人回复
- Electropolymerization: Concepts, Materials and Applications. Wiley
已经有127人回复
- Research Engineer and one Postdoc of membrane bioreactor
已经有7人回复
- 【Discussion】WITH LOVE AND TRUST(From foreign cheat，Be Careful !)
已经有16人回复
- Electrochemistry Communications和Biosensors and Bioelectronics哪个好
已经有6人回复
点击这里搜索更多相关资源科研从小木虫开始，人人为我，我为人人
