24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 560  |  回复: 2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

angel19860820

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 审稿人说解决他说的问题可以投到更好的杂志所以拒绝现在投的杂志,靠谱不?已有2人参与

This manuscript describes ****. The data is interesting and adds to our growing knowledge about the ***. However, there are a number of issues with the manuscript, which preclude me from recommending it for publication in Chinese Science Bulletin. Once these issues are addressed, this manuscript would probably be a better fit into another journal more devoted to environmental chemistry, such as water research and water science and technology. Such journals are quality venues that are much suitable for dissemination of this work. A major problem with the manuscript is the ***. There is lack of important information about ***. Also, the adsorbents are observed to have different adsorption potential and further analysis of which property governs adsorption capacity of the adsorbents is necessary. Besides, accuracy and linear range of the method should be described in the text or compared with other techniques such as HPLC and HPLC-MS. These experiments are a key component of the overall study, and as described, there just isn't enough information for solid conclusions to be drawn.
如上是审稿人意见,我本来投的那个Chinese science bulletin 不是什么好杂志,但是审稿人说如果我解决了他说的几个问题,我可以投到更相关的杂志如water research。请问他这种审稿意见是否靠谱?我是不是应该按照他的方法再补充内容后投到更高档次的,还是审稿人只是想安慰下我受伤的心灵?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zwp781229

铜虫 (小有名气)

确实有这种事儿!
3楼2014-01-16 14:19:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

timegardener

银虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得这跟安慰没关系,你应该按照他的方法再补充内容后投到更高档次的。好象很大修!
弟子不必不如师,师不必贤于弟子! http://shijianyuanding.com/
2楼2012-05-02 16:23:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见