This manuscript describes ****. The data is interesting and adds to our growing knowledge about the ***. However, there are a number of issues with the manuscript, which preclude me from recommending it for publication in Chinese Science Bulletin. Once these issues are addressed, this manuscript would probably be a better fit into another journal more devoted to environmental chemistry, such as water research and water science and technology. Such journals are quality venues that are much suitable for dissemination of this work. A major problem with the manuscript is the ***. There is lack of important information about ***. Also, the adsorbents are observed to have different adsorption potential and further analysis of which property governs adsorption capacity of the adsorbents is necessary. Besides, accuracy and linear range of the method should be described in the text or compared with other techniques such as HPLC and HPLC-MS. These experiments are a key component of the overall study, and as described, there just isn't enough information for solid conclusions to be drawn.
如上是审稿人意见,我本来投的那个Chinese science bulletin 不是什么好杂志,但是审稿人说如果我解决了他说的几个问题,我可以投到更相关的杂志如water research。请问他这种审稿意见是否靠谱?我是不是应该按照他的方法再补充内容后投到更高档次的,还是审稿人只是想安慰下我受伤的心灵? |