| ²é¿´: 1145 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
zhanghx561Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
»ùÓÚMIROCÄ£ÐͺÍCCSMÄ£ÐͶÔÄ©´Î±ùÆÚÄ£ÄâÓÐʲô²»Í¬
|
|
|
ÈçÌ⣬ÎÄÕÂÉó¸åÈËÌá³öÀ´ÒªÎһشðÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ¡£µ«ÊÇÎÒÊǸöÖ²ÎïרҵµÄÑо¿Éú£¬¶ÔÕâ¸öÎÊÌâÓе㲻ÊìϤ¡£Çó´ó¼Ò¸ø¸ö½¨Òé Why MIROC LGM climate is ok but CCSM is not ok? I think different (palaeo-)climate models have different performance. Authors need to understand the advantages and disadvantages of different climate models used. Otherwise, more climate model outputs should be taken into account. On the other hand, what is the key climate feature during the LGM simulated by the MIROC model? |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
282Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
µØÇòÎïÀíѧºÍ¿Õ¼äÎïÀíѧÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ226È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
~~~ÇóÖ¸½Ì~~~tecplotÖÐËÙ¶ÈʸÁ¿Í¼µÄÎÊÌâ~~~~~
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÓÃDPMÄ£ÐÍʱ£¬solutionÀïÃæ»á²»»áÓÐ discrece model·½³Ì
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎµÃµ½²»Í¬½ØÃæÉÏËÙ¶È·Ö²¼·Ö²¼²»¾ùÔȶȣ¬Çë¸÷λ¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãÒ»¶þ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¾Ñé! FLUENT¼ÆËãʱҪѡ»ÆµÀ¼ªÈÕ
ÒѾÓÐ95È˻ظ´
»ÒÖ¸¼×Ò©ÀíÄ£ÐÍ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
CFD½²Òå-ÍÄÁ÷Ä£ÐÍ
ÒѾÓÐ304È˻ظ´
ÔËÓÃÀëÉ¢ÏàÄ£ÐÍÄ£ÄâÆø¹ÌÁ½ÏàÖÐÈçºÎÌí¼Ó¿ÅÁ£µÄÏà¹ØÊÜÁ¦
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ʲôÊÇũҵģÄâÄ£ÐÍ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ä£Äâ³íÃÜÆø¹ÌÁ½ÏàÁ÷µÄ¿ÅÁ£Á÷¶¯ÐÐΪÓÃʲôģÐÍÄØ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿FLUENT ÀäÈÈË®»ìºÏ Ñ¡ÔñʲôģÐÍ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿dlpolyÄÜÁ¿²»ÊÕÁ²
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿ÓÃʲôÈí¼þ½¨Ä£ºó£¬Ä£ÐÍ¿ÉÒÔµ¼ÈëAUTODYN
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
zhanghx561
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 14 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 667.9
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 173
- ÔÚÏß: 156.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1207398
- ×¢²á: 2011-02-20
- רҵ: Ö²Îï½ø»¯ÉúÎïѧ
3Â¥2012-03-05 10:43:49
yetsyu
Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 233.7
- Ìû×Ó: 41
- ÔÚÏß: 12.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1335501
- ×¢²á: 2011-07-01
- רҵ: ÊýÖµÔ¤±¨ÓëÊýֵģÄâ
2Â¥2012-03-05 07:19:19
yetsyu
Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 233.7
- Ìû×Ó: 41
- ÔÚÏß: 12.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1335501
- ×¢²á: 2011-07-01
- רҵ: ÊýÖµÔ¤±¨ÓëÊýֵģÄâ
4Â¥2012-03-05 14:29:28
zhanghx561
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 14 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 667.9
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 173
- ÔÚÏß: 156.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1207398
- ×¢²á: 2011-02-20
- רҵ: Ö²Îï½ø»¯ÉúÎïѧ
5Â¥2012-03-05 19:29:01













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥