|
|
[求助]
请各位帮忙看以下审稿意见,不知道如何修改!
求助:论文投measurement,终审意见:Therefore I must reject it but you are given an option to resubmit the paper.
其中一个审稿人意见:The paper is commended to be accepted.。
另一个审稿人意见:Reviewer #2: It is not clear what is the novelty of the method, its unique characteristics and advantages compared to similar methods in the literature. What is being done, why and how? What is basically new that has not been done? How is this approach put in context with other approaches? Also, simulation results are not significant enough to verify the presented scheme.
不知道根据这个意见如何修改?还有没有必要resubmit?各位给点意见啊,谢谢! |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
延安大学回应“副教授留绝笔信”:确已离世,正核实举报内容
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有23人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有22人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|