24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1948  |  回复: 6

gengw07

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 有关LDA+U U值的问题

castep计算中使用LDA+U或者GGA+U,文献中看到Ueff=U-J,castep中的U是哪个呢?是U还是Ueff,而且也没有设置J的地方,帮助文件中似乎也没有提到。希望高手给予解释,谢谢。文献使用VASP,好像是U、J分开设置的。
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

first principle

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gongjijun

木虫 (正式写手)

同样的问题,静候高手
2楼2011-09-20 18:32:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzjzjnb

银虫 (小有名气)

我也想知道
3楼2011-09-21 06:58:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vdmzsfj

银虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


gengw07(金币+10): 谢谢帮助 2011-09-22 09:38:00
zzy870720z(金币+1): 谢谢提示 2011-09-22 13:03:50
U值等于U-J值
CASTEP的话请参考Acta Mater 59, 1742 (2011)
4楼2011-09-21 21:05:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vdmzsfj

银虫 (著名写手)


uuv2010(金币+1): 多谢提示 2011-09-26 10:13:28
前面有误,特此更正!
CASTEP中U值等于U-J值,

ACTA MATERIALIA  卷: 59   期: 4   页: 1742-1760   DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.041   出版年: FEB 2011
这个讲得很全!
5楼2011-09-22 13:55:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzjzjnb

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by vdmzsfj at 2011-09-22 13:55:18:
前面有误,特此更正!
CASTEP中U值等于U-J值,

ACTA MATERIALIA  卷: 59   期: 4   页: 1742-1760   DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.041   出版年: FEB 2011
这个讲得很全!

多谢多谢啦
6楼2011-09-23 06:27:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dufeifei

金虫 (小有名气)


uuv2010(金币+1): 欢迎参加交流 2011-09-26 10:13:56
VASP手册上来的,楼主研究一下     U,J分开设,但是具体的材料应该有经验值。

The L(S)DA+U in VASP is switched on by means of the following tags


LDAU = .TRUE. Switches on the L(S)DA+U.
LDAUTYPE = 1|2|4 Type of L(S)DA+U (Default: LDAUTYPE = 2)
1
Rotationally invariant LSDA+U according to Liechtenstein et al.
4
Idem 1., but LDA+U instead of LSDA+U (i.e. no LSDA exchange splitting)
2
Dudarev's approach to LSDA+U (Default)
LDAUL = L .. -quantum number for which the on site interaction is added
(-1: no on site terms added, 1: p, 2: d, 3: f, Default: LDAUL = 2)
LDAUU = U .. Effective on site Coulomb interaction parameter
LDAUJ = J .. Effective on site Exchange interaction parameter
LDAUPRINT = 0|1|2 Controls verbosity of the L(S)DA+U module
(0: silent, 1: Write occupancy matrix to OUTCAR, 2: idem 1., plus potential matrix dumped to stdout, Default: LDAUPRINT = 0)
NB: LDAUL, LDAUU, and LDAUJ must be specified for all atomic species!


It is important to be aware of the fact that when using the L(S)DA+U, in general the total energy will depend on the parameters  and . It is therefore not meaningful to compare the total energies resulting from calculations with different  and/or  [c.q.  in case of Dudarev's approach].

Note on bandstructure calculation: The CHGCAR file also contains only information up to LMAXMIX for the on-site PAW occupancy matrices. When the CHGCAR file is read and kept fixed in the course of the calculations (ICHARG=11), the results will be necessarily not identical to a selfconsistent run. The deviations can be (or actually are) large for L(S)DA+U calculations. For the calculation of band structures within the L(S)DA+U approach, it is hence strictly required to increase LMAXMIX to 4 (d elements) and 6 (f elements).
7楼2011-09-25 16:30:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 gengw07 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见