24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 173  |  回复: 0

andy_ytg

金虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 帮忙分析下这个审稿意见~~~

一篇论文刚审回,“moderate revise”,具体意见如下:
The subject is reasonable and presents ***(此处省略n个字,都是一些对文章肯定的话).
Nevertheless, I make some suggestions that I feel would improve the quality and significance of the manuscript.

One of the interesting properties for the use in optoelectronic applications is the wide bandgap (3.37 eV) showed by the ZnO.  In their last sentence of section 3.3 (photoluminescence), based on the ref 27 and 28, the authors write: "the lattice defects in the ZnO array induce the increase of carrier concentration, which causes that the Fermi level moves into the conduction band since ZnO is naturally a n-type semiconductor" It would be interesting to perform UV-Visible absorbance experimento to obtain the band gap of this ZnO array or to perform theoretical calculations to characterize the band structure of this material
The author use different units for the energy of emission peaks. The blue shift for the UV peaks is 5 nm (=43 meV) and only of 1nm (=8 meV) for the peak around 438 nm.
这个意见是需要增加数据吗?但加了就超过期刊的限制了。
moderate revise,这种情况需要修改的篇幅大吗?我现在想到的就是增加几个单词,感觉想小修。大家moderate revise的经验是什么?

[ Last edited by andy_ytg on 2011-8-3 at 19:00 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

智能机器人

Robot (super robot)

我们都爱小木虫

相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 andy_ytg 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见