24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3291)
>虫友互识 (451)
>导师招生 (163)
>休闲灌水 (163)
>文献求助 (146)
>论文投稿 (108)
>考博 (97)
>博后之家 (75)
>论文道贺祈福 (63)
>招聘信息布告栏 (56)
>基金申请 (49)
>硕博家园 (47)
>教师之家 (45)
>找工作 (44)
>考研 (41)
>公派出国 (18)

返回列表

andy_ytg

金虫 (著名写手)

应助: 15 (小学生)
金币: 6243.6
散金: 4366
红花: 6
帖子: 1242
在线: 816.6小时
虫号: 808541
注册: 2009-07-13
性别: GG
专业: 半导体物理

[求助] 帮忙分析下这个审稿意见~~~

一篇论文刚审回，“moderate revise”，具体意见如下：
The subject is reasonable and presents ***（此处省略n个字，都是一些对文章肯定的话）.
Nevertheless, I make some suggestions that I feel would improve the quality and significance of the manuscript.

One of the interesting properties for the use in optoelectronic applications is the wide bandgap (3.37 eV) showed by the ZnO. In their last sentence of section 3.3 (photoluminescence), based on the ref 27 and 28, the authors write: "the lattice defects in the ZnO array induce the increase of carrier concentration, which causes that the Fermi level moves into the conduction band since ZnO is naturally a n-type semiconductor" It would be interesting to perform UV-Visible absorbance experimento to obtain the band gap of this ZnO array or to perform theoretical calculations to characterize the band structure of this material
The author use different units for the energy of emission peaks. The blue shift for the UV peaks is 5 nm (=43 meV) and only of 1nm (=8 meV) for the peak around 438 nm.
这个意见是需要增加数据吗？但加了就超过期刊的限制了。
moderate revise，这种情况需要修改的篇幅大吗？我现在想到的就是增加几个单词，感觉想小修。大家moderate revise的经验是什么？

[ Last edited by andy_ytg on 2011-8-3 at 19:00 ]

回复此楼