24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1533  |  回复: 7

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

[交流] 澳洲自己对journal的评价系统ending了哦 已有3人参与

刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Academy of Science welcomed today’s decision by the Government and the Australian Research Council to end the system of ranking academic journals as A*, A, B and C.
The ranking system was a highly controversial component of the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of university disciplines.
Science Minister Kim Carr today announced that the rankings system will end, giving more authority to the panels that examine and assess research activities undertaken around Australian universities on a discipline-by-discipline basis.
Australian Academy of Science Secretary for Science Policy Professor Bob Williamson said the new approach is much more appropriate than bibliometric assessments of disciplines.
“In our recent submission to the Australian Research Council, the Australian Academy of Science argued strongly that key areas such as interdisciplinary research and new research were seriously disadvantaged by journal ranking,” Professor Williamson said.

“This affected not only areas of science and technology, but also interactions between the sciences and the humanities.”
“It has been very distressing to see some universities using publications in highly ranked journals as the basis for funding, promotions, and even staff appointments.
“The ranking of a journal as A* does not mean every paper in it is first rate, and some very good papers may appear in smaller journals.
“People whose work is very relevant to Australian issues rather than internationally, and those in new fields or collaborating between several universities, have been particularly disadvantaged.”
The Academy’s submission to the Australian Research Council (ARC) ERA consultation process earlier this year urged a move towards the type of peer-review system announced today.
“We welcomed most features of the ERA, and today’s announcement has removed the single biggest problem,” Professor Williamson said.
“The integrity of science relies upon this type of peer review. The Academy commends Minister Carr for recognising that this process also should be integral to assessing the quality of Australian research.”
The Academy’s submission is available at www.science.org.au/reports/documents/era-submission%20.pdf
Professor Williamson is available for comment until 7:15pm today on.....

[ Last edited by bird870306 on 2011-5-30 at 14:44 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

沙发自己坐
2楼2011-05-30 14:44:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jessicadou

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?
3楼2011-05-30 15:02:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jessicadou at 2011-05-30 15:02:57:
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?

这个今天才出的,不知道呢,他后面也说 更换之类的。

应该都是一样的
4楼2011-05-30 15:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 14:41:50:
刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Aca ...

不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking
5楼2011-05-30 18:09:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by kevinzz at 2011-05-30 18:09:04:
不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking

我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?
6楼2011-05-30 18:16:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 18:16:51:
我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?

是啊,我们系里也转发这个了。
这个排名上面A* A类的多数有澳洲人在那个journal editorial board里面。
你懂的,呵呵
7楼2011-05-30 18:46:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gaoqingwen

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问下 目前ERA Journal Ranking还 打A,B,C么?谢谢~!
努力
8楼2015-02-03 14:56:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 bird870306 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-09-01 15:18 by myrtle
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-09-01 12:58 by ssyjh
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 15/750 2026-09-01 12:23 by icm639
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +6 yuleib84 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-31 19:46 by 鱼翔浅底1
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
信息提示
请填处理意见