24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1517  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

[交流] 澳洲自己对journal的评价系统ending了哦 已有3人参与

刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Academy of Science welcomed today’s decision by the Government and the Australian Research Council to end the system of ranking academic journals as A*, A, B and C.
The ranking system was a highly controversial component of the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of university disciplines.
Science Minister Kim Carr today announced that the rankings system will end, giving more authority to the panels that examine and assess research activities undertaken around Australian universities on a discipline-by-discipline basis.
Australian Academy of Science Secretary for Science Policy Professor Bob Williamson said the new approach is much more appropriate than bibliometric assessments of disciplines.
“In our recent submission to the Australian Research Council, the Australian Academy of Science argued strongly that key areas such as interdisciplinary research and new research were seriously disadvantaged by journal ranking,” Professor Williamson said.

“This affected not only areas of science and technology, but also interactions between the sciences and the humanities.”
“It has been very distressing to see some universities using publications in highly ranked journals as the basis for funding, promotions, and even staff appointments.
“The ranking of a journal as A* does not mean every paper in it is first rate, and some very good papers may appear in smaller journals.
“People whose work is very relevant to Australian issues rather than internationally, and those in new fields or collaborating between several universities, have been particularly disadvantaged.”
The Academy’s submission to the Australian Research Council (ARC) ERA consultation process earlier this year urged a move towards the type of peer-review system announced today.
“We welcomed most features of the ERA, and today’s announcement has removed the single biggest problem,” Professor Williamson said.
“The integrity of science relies upon this type of peer review. The Academy commends Minister Carr for recognising that this process also should be integral to assessing the quality of Australian research.”
The Academy’s submission is available at www.science.org.au/reports/documents/era-submission%20.pdf
Professor Williamson is available for comment until 7:15pm today on.....

[ Last edited by bird870306 on 2011-5-30 at 14:44 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 14:41:50:
刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Aca ...

不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking
5楼2011-05-30 18:09:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

jessicadou

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?
3楼2011-05-30 15:02:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jessicadou at 2011-05-30 15:02:57:
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?

这个今天才出的,不知道呢,他后面也说 更换之类的。

应该都是一样的
4楼2011-05-30 15:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by kevinzz at 2011-05-30 18:09:04:
不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking

我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?
6楼2011-05-30 18:16:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +6 archvillain 2026-08-15 10/500 2026-08-15 14:29 by 枫叶之巅
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +26 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 57/2850 2026-08-15 14:25 by JChen2024
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +7 majunge000 2026-08-11 9/450 2026-08-15 13:34 by kiz2011
[考博] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-15 12:33 by KxMI1BYBxWX1
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +5 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 9/450 2026-08-15 11:33 by KxMI1BYBxWX1
[基金申请] filecode +7 cratir 2026-08-14 11/550 2026-08-15 06:19 by 学员8dgXkO
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 02:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 01:28 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +23 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 37/1850 2026-08-14 13:40 by Equinoxhua
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +10 家与远方 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-14 02:08 by 绵羊哥哥
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
信息提示
请填处理意见