24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1371  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

[交流] 澳洲自己对journal的评价系统ending了哦 已有3人参与

刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Academy of Science welcomed today’s decision by the Government and the Australian Research Council to end the system of ranking academic journals as A*, A, B and C.
The ranking system was a highly controversial component of the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of university disciplines.
Science Minister Kim Carr today announced that the rankings system will end, giving more authority to the panels that examine and assess research activities undertaken around Australian universities on a discipline-by-discipline basis.
Australian Academy of Science Secretary for Science Policy Professor Bob Williamson said the new approach is much more appropriate than bibliometric assessments of disciplines.
“In our recent submission to the Australian Research Council, the Australian Academy of Science argued strongly that key areas such as interdisciplinary research and new research were seriously disadvantaged by journal ranking,” Professor Williamson said.

“This affected not only areas of science and technology, but also interactions between the sciences and the humanities.”
“It has been very distressing to see some universities using publications in highly ranked journals as the basis for funding, promotions, and even staff appointments.
“The ranking of a journal as A* does not mean every paper in it is first rate, and some very good papers may appear in smaller journals.
“People whose work is very relevant to Australian issues rather than internationally, and those in new fields or collaborating between several universities, have been particularly disadvantaged.”
The Academy’s submission to the Australian Research Council (ARC) ERA consultation process earlier this year urged a move towards the type of peer-review system announced today.
“We welcomed most features of the ERA, and today’s announcement has removed the single biggest problem,” Professor Williamson said.
“The integrity of science relies upon this type of peer review. The Academy commends Minister Carr for recognising that this process also should be integral to assessing the quality of Australian research.”
The Academy’s submission is available at www.science.org.au/reports/documents/era-submission%20.pdf
Professor Williamson is available for comment until 7:15pm today on.....

[ Last edited by bird870306 on 2011-5-30 at 14:44 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 18:16:51:
我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?

是啊,我们系里也转发这个了。
这个排名上面A* A类的多数有澳洲人在那个journal editorial board里面。
你懂的,呵呵
7楼2011-05-30 18:46:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

jessicadou

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?
3楼2011-05-30 15:02:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jessicadou at 2011-05-30 15:02:57:
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?

这个今天才出的,不知道呢,他后面也说 更换之类的。

应该都是一样的
4楼2011-05-30 15:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 14:41:50:
刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Aca ...

不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking
5楼2011-05-30 18:09:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见