24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1498  |  回复: 7

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

[交流] 澳洲自己对journal的评价系统ending了哦 已有3人参与

刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Academy of Science welcomed today’s decision by the Government and the Australian Research Council to end the system of ranking academic journals as A*, A, B and C.
The ranking system was a highly controversial component of the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of university disciplines.
Science Minister Kim Carr today announced that the rankings system will end, giving more authority to the panels that examine and assess research activities undertaken around Australian universities on a discipline-by-discipline basis.
Australian Academy of Science Secretary for Science Policy Professor Bob Williamson said the new approach is much more appropriate than bibliometric assessments of disciplines.
“In our recent submission to the Australian Research Council, the Australian Academy of Science argued strongly that key areas such as interdisciplinary research and new research were seriously disadvantaged by journal ranking,” Professor Williamson said.

“This affected not only areas of science and technology, but also interactions between the sciences and the humanities.”
“It has been very distressing to see some universities using publications in highly ranked journals as the basis for funding, promotions, and even staff appointments.
“The ranking of a journal as A* does not mean every paper in it is first rate, and some very good papers may appear in smaller journals.
“People whose work is very relevant to Australian issues rather than internationally, and those in new fields or collaborating between several universities, have been particularly disadvantaged.”
The Academy’s submission to the Australian Research Council (ARC) ERA consultation process earlier this year urged a move towards the type of peer-review system announced today.
“We welcomed most features of the ERA, and today’s announcement has removed the single biggest problem,” Professor Williamson said.
“The integrity of science relies upon this type of peer review. The Academy commends Minister Carr for recognising that this process also should be integral to assessing the quality of Australian research.”
The Academy’s submission is available at www.science.org.au/reports/documents/era-submission%20.pdf
Professor Williamson is available for comment until 7:15pm today on.....

[ Last edited by bird870306 on 2011-5-30 at 14:44 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

沙发自己坐
2楼2011-05-30 14:44:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jessicadou

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?
3楼2011-05-30 15:02:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by jessicadou at 2011-05-30 15:02:57:
Thanks.  那么新的评价体系对文史类的有要求吗 ?  中文期刊呢?

这个今天才出的,不知道呢,他后面也说 更换之类的。

应该都是一样的
4楼2011-05-30 15:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 14:41:50:
刚刚收到的email,立马就发上来了,貌似那个 澳洲自己的判定系统停止了。
之前发的那些个ranking,大伙不用再考虑了

Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings

The Australian Aca ...

不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking
5楼2011-05-30 18:09:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bird870306

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by kevinzz at 2011-05-30 18:09:04:
不错,少了一个自娱自乐的ranking

我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?
6楼2011-05-30 18:16:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kevinzz

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by bird870306 at 2011-05-30 18:16:51:
我也觉得呗
你收到邮件了么?

是啊,我们系里也转发这个了。
这个排名上面A* A类的多数有澳洲人在那个journal editorial board里面。
你懂的,呵呵
7楼2011-05-30 18:46:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gaoqingwen

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问下 目前ERA Journal Ranking还 打A,B,C么?谢谢~!
努力
8楼2015-02-03 14:56:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 bird870306 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +3 布布和一二 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-08 17:46 by zhanghaozhu
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 qTvzQBRAHjCi 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-08 17:27 by oEVWOejN9taj
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 qTvzQBRAHjCi 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 16:47 by oEVWOejN9taj
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 Vi50GxzrFcSG 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 15:59 by oEVWOejN9taj
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +9 Tide man 2026-08-08 17/850 2026-08-08 14:56 by archvillain
[博后之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:42 by oEVWOejN9taj
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:39 by oEVWOejN9taj
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +4 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 14:27 by oEVWOejN9taj
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +5 a089 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 14:04 by alian_214
[论文投稿] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 KXLV3nuBVBY7 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:01 by oEVWOejN9taj
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +11 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 14/700 2026-08-08 12:50 by 布布和一二
[硕博家园] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 Vi50GxzrFcSG 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 10:19 by 3OOjAIS77qg2
[基金申请] 娱乐 +6 Tide man 2026-08-03 6/300 2026-08-07 22:40 by 铁帽子农民
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] 听说今天filecode变了 +24 布布和一二 2026-08-06 47/2350 2026-08-07 16:02 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +3 布布和一二 2026-08-07 3/150 2026-08-07 15:09 by gltch
[基金申请] filecode +14 等待解的谜 2026-08-06 19/950 2026-08-07 12:20 by wlwhappy
[基金申请] 8月时间戳变的,举个手。玩一下,释放压力 +9 archvillain 2026-08-04 11/550 2026-08-05 20:06 by wlwhappy
[基金申请] 面上提前没消息,有中的吗 +14 archvillain 2026-08-02 18/900 2026-08-04 14:42 by archvillain
[基金申请] 什么时候能放榜呀? +3 Jacob678 2026-08-03 3/150 2026-08-03 16:14 by gltch
信息提示
请填处理意见