24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lilei119

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1734.1
帖子: 751
在线: 531.3小时
虫号: 569135

[交流] 帮看看es&t 审稿意见

文章被拒，3个意见，第1个审稿人，拒绝，意见只有2句不痛不痒的话，第2个审稿人，拒绝，意见一般，不过里面的问题基本上都是不重要或者审稿人由于没仔细看文章而下的论断。第3个建议大修，但是对文章的重要性和创新性予以的好评。而且看得出来，这个人对我做的东西比较了解。此外，评审人所有问题都可以比较好的回答或者反驳。
请各位专家帮看看下面这个编辑意见怎么样？个人感觉编辑没完全否定文章：I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.是否有重投的必要性？或是编辑拒绝文章都是这种的口气，即使很烂也是这样拒绝？
意见如下：
Your manuscript was assigned to me for editorial handling by ES&T Editor Dr. Jerald Schnoor. I have received three reviews of your manuscript (attached). As you will see, two of the reviewers noted that the research was quite thorough and included a substantial amount of new information that might be valuable to the research community. However, all three reviewers noted significant shortcomings. In particular, Reviewer 2 indicated that the manuscript lacked novelty and included numerous statements that were not well supported by data. Reviewers 2 and 3 both noted a lack of information on the reproducibility of experiments while Reviewer 1 questioned the relevance of using pure cyanobacteria cultures to gain insight into this problem.

On the basis of these concerns, I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic. Although this manuscript is not appropriate for publication in ES&T, your interest in publishing your work in ES&T is appreciated. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.

[ Last edited by lilei119 on 2011-5-14 at 15:46 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

帮忙看看审稿意见（有关氢键键能）已经有7人回复
帮忙看看这个审稿意见是什么意思已经有4人回复
【求助】有劳虫友高手帮忙看看acs审稿意见，多谢！已经有5人回复
投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）已经有32人回复
投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？已经有32人回复
【求助】麻烦帮忙看看我的审稿意见怎么回复啊，关于SEI膜已经有13人回复
【求助】请大家帮我看看Applied Catalysis B 的审稿意见吧，谢谢啦已经有14人回复
【求助】帮我看看审稿人的意见是否又接受的希望已经有22人回复
文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！已经有6人回复
Talanta文章被拒，但请各位帮我看看这样的审稿意见是什么意思已经有15人回复
审稿意见，第一次投稿不知道还有没有戏？大家帮助看看，导师不管，没有人问已经有4人回复
第一次发SCI，麻烦高人帮我看看这条审稿意见如何回复已经有19人回复
请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见已经有4人回复
审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不已经有24人回复
帮忙看看如何回复审稿人意见，急！！！已经有5人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-05-14 14:53:35

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应助: 2283 (讲师)
贵宾: 0.05
金币: 17310
帖子: 15735
在线: 2926.6小时
虫号: 489254

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

Originally posted by liuxing1-1 at 2011-05-15 09:32:32:
重投希望很小，建议改投其他刊物

重投接收的希望应该很大。我建议重投的原因很清楚了。
http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?fid=125&tid=3190892&authorid=489254

不知道你是针对这个杂志这样说，还是根据审稿意见？我的话也是从编辑角度说的。大家尽量找机会与各种编辑讨论讨论，就知道了。
http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1922573