应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 帮看看es&t 审稿意见
51/1返回列表
查看: 4389  |  回复: 22
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lilei119

新虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 帮看看es&t 审稿意见

文章被拒，3个意见，第1个审稿人，拒绝，意见只有2句不痛不痒的话，第2个审稿人，拒绝，意见一般，不过里面的问题基本上都是不重要或者审稿人由于没仔细看文章而下的论断。第3个建议大修，但是对文章的重要性和创新性予以的好评。而且看得出来，这个人对我做的东西比较了解。此外，评审人所有问题都可以比较好的回答或者反驳。
请各位专家帮看看下面这个编辑意见怎么样？个人感觉编辑没完全否定文章：I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.是否有重投的必要性？或是编辑拒绝文章都是这种的口气，即使很烂也是这样拒绝？
意见如下：
Your manuscript was assigned to me for editorial handling by ES&T Editor Dr. Jerald Schnoor.  I have received three reviews of your manuscript (attached).  As you will see, two of the reviewers noted that the research was quite thorough and included a substantial amount of new information that might be valuable to the research community.  However, all three reviewers noted significant shortcomings.  In particular, Reviewer 2 indicated that the manuscript lacked novelty and included numerous statements that were not well supported by data.  Reviewers 2 and 3 both noted a lack of information on the reproducibility of experiments while Reviewer 1 questioned the relevance of using pure cyanobacteria cultures to gain insight into this problem.

On the basis of these concerns, I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form.  I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic.  Although this manuscript is not appropriate for publication in ES&T, your interest in publishing your work in ES&T is appreciated.  I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.

[ Last edited by lilei119 on 2011-5-14 at 15:46 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-05-14 14:53:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by lilei119 at 2011-05-14 16:15:00:
呵呵，谢谢您的回复，不过不知道您是看了编辑的回信而建议我重投还是只是精神上支持？

我是看了你的贴“评审人所有问题都可以比较好的回答或者反驳” - 唉，连我也不信，就算了。你看看每个人发的贴，都有什么经验。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2011-05-14 16:20:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
lilei119(金币+1):谢谢参与
你能解决多数问题，或给以适当解释，不重投的话，就亏大了。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2011-05-14 14:58:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pepperp

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
★
lilei119(金币+1):谢谢参与
重投希望很小，建议改投其他刊物
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2011-05-14 15:12:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nandi2212

新虫 (知名作家)
★
lilei119(金币+1):谢谢参与
重投难度很大，不过也可以一试
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
4楼2011-05-14 15:23:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭