24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 7499  |  回复: 16

outspace588

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 投到PNAS的文章挂了,发帖纪念一下 已有15人参与

1.Stage Start Date

Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2011-02-24
Pending Final Recommendation 2011-02-16
Under Editorial Board Review 2011-01-31
Quality Control Review Completed 2011-01-31
Quality Control Review Started 2011-01-29
Author Approved Submission 2011-01-29
Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2011-01-29
Waiting for File Conversion 2011-01-29
Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted 2011-01-29

2。拒稿信
第一部分应该是一个拒稿信模板,还好编辑在后边还给了一个remark,虽然没有得到审稿意见,也算是有点收获了。
February 24, 2011

Dear Dr. ******,

I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has declined your manuscript [MS# *****]. We receive many more good papers than we can publish and the Board must carefully weigh which papers merit external review. The expert who served as editor concluded that although this work is interesting, it does not have the broad appeal needed for PNAS and is better suited for a more specialized journal.

Once a paper has been declined, it may not be resubmitted through an Academy member. Note that the PNAS License to Publish conveyed at initial submission is terminated.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PNAS. I am sorry we cannot be more encouraging this time, and I hope you will consider submitting future work to PNAS.

Sincerely yours,
Randy Schekman
Editor-in-Chief

****************************

Editorial Board Member Comments:
Editorial Board Member:

Overall Rating:
Reject w/o review - specialty journal

Remarks to Author:


I regret that I cannot recommend sending this paper out for review for PNAS. We receive many manuscripts whose subject matter is more specialized than is appropriate for publication in PNAS and I believe that this is such a manuscript. I would suggest submitting it to Geomorphology or to a similar journal that covers this aspect of surficial geology. Thank you for considering PNAS for publication.

3。一点感觉:1.PNAS的投稿程序实在太繁琐了;2。PNAS和NS一样,也追求borad significance。我的专业方向在PNAS给定的学科分类里面竟然 找不到合适的位置,检索了PNAS,竟然没有找到一篇正统的我这个方向的文章。想在上面发文章难,太难了。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

smilma

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
PNAS 啊 祝福楼主早日突破
青春有梦,勇敢去追。跌倒了,爬起来再哭。
2楼2011-02-25 10:48:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cjn10

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
回复的速度还算快,不到一个月
不在迷雾中趴下,就走迷雾中前行
4楼2011-02-25 14:04:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

laoda111

木虫 (著名写手)

你的协作者中,有美国人吗?如果没有,请别投这个了,中不了。
光生电,神奇的现象。
5楼2011-02-25 14:06:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by smilma at 2011-02-25 10:48:43:
PNAS 啊 祝福楼主早日突破

能投此类刊物都是
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
3楼2011-02-25 11:04:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lqingh506

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

楼主很牛啊,这杂志都投了
6楼2011-02-25 16:25:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mouse0601

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这个不是要美国院士推荐的么~
7楼2011-02-25 16:36:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wwkong

新虫 (小有名气)

被拒似乎不是因为学科与专业问题


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
信里强调了PNAS论文的基本要求是broad appeal。作者的文章应该不具备这点。任何学科,只要能揭示具有一定普遍性的规律,应该都可以被PNAS考虑。不少文章揭示的都是很局限的问题和个例,被此等杂志拒稿是正常不过的了。
宁静以致远,淡泊以明志。
8楼2011-02-25 18:18:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
9楼2011-02-25 19:48:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

祝福楼主早日突破
10楼2011-02-25 19:52:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 outspace588 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见