| ²é¿´: 7745 | »Ø¸´: 16 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
outspace588Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Ͷµ½PNASµÄÎÄÕ¹ÒÁË£¬·¢Ìû¼ÍÄîһϠÒÑÓÐ15È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
1.Stage Start Date Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2011-02-24 Pending Final Recommendation 2011-02-16 Under Editorial Board Review 2011-01-31 Quality Control Review Completed 2011-01-31 Quality Control Review Started 2011-01-29 Author Approved Submission 2011-01-29 Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2011-01-29 Waiting for File Conversion 2011-01-29 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted 2011-01-29 2¡£¾Ü¸åÐÅ µÚÒ»²¿·ÖÓ¦¸ÃÊÇÒ»¸ö¾Ü¸åÐÅÄ£°å£¬»¹ºÃ±à¼ÔÚºó±ß»¹¸øÁËÒ»¸öremark£¬ËäȻûÓеõ½Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ò²ËãÊÇÓеãÊÕ»ñÁË¡£ February 24, 2011 Dear Dr. ******, I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has declined your manuscript [MS# *****]. We receive many more good papers than we can publish and the Board must carefully weigh which papers merit external review. The expert who served as editor concluded that although this work is interesting, it does not have the broad appeal needed for PNAS and is better suited for a more specialized journal. Once a paper has been declined, it may not be resubmitted through an Academy member. Note that the PNAS License to Publish conveyed at initial submission is terminated. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PNAS. I am sorry we cannot be more encouraging this time, and I hope you will consider submitting future work to PNAS. Sincerely yours, Randy Schekman Editor-in-Chief **************************** Editorial Board Member Comments: Editorial Board Member: Overall Rating: Reject w/o review - specialty journal Remarks to Author: I regret that I cannot recommend sending this paper out for review for PNAS. We receive many manuscripts whose subject matter is more specialized than is appropriate for publication in PNAS and I believe that this is such a manuscript. I would suggest submitting it to Geomorphology or to a similar journal that covers this aspect of surficial geology. Thank you for considering PNAS for publication. 3¡£Ò»µã¸Ð¾õ£º1.PNASµÄͶ¸å³ÌÐòʵÔÚÌ«·±ËöÁË£»2¡£PNASºÍNSÒ»Ñù£¬Ò²×·Çóborad significance¡£ÎÒµÄרҵ·½ÏòÔÚPNAS¸ø¶¨µÄѧ¿Æ·ÖÀàÀïÃæ¾¹È» ÕÒ²»µ½ºÏÊʵÄλÖ㬼ìË÷ÁËPNAS£¬¾¹È»Ã»ÓÐÕÒµ½Ò»ÆªÕýͳµÄÎÒÕâ¸ö·½ÏòµÄÎÄÕ¡£ÏëÔÚÉÏÃæ·¢ÎÄÕÂÄÑ£¬Ì«ÄÑÁË¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏ£¬·ÄÖ¯£¬ÉúÎ0856¡¢0710£©£¬»¯Ñ§ÕÐÉúÀ²
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á £¬Áù¼¶Òѹý£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¹¤¿Æ²ÄÁÏ085601 279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ071000 329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ071005
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
pending recommendation Ö®ºóÓÐ under review
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
PNASÕâÊÇÒª¾Ü¸åÂ𣿿´²»¶®£¡
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
PNASͶ¸å½É·Ñ×Éѯ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¡¾ÆäËû¡¿´¿Ë®£¬¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû¼ÍÄîÌû
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾·ÖÏí¡¿Ô¬Â¡Æ½ÔºÊ¿Á½ÓÅÅà¾Å³¬¼¶ÔÓ½»Ë®µ¾×ªÂ¼×é·ÖÎöÎÄÕ£¬·¢±íÔÚPNASÉÏ
ÒѾÓÐ59È˻ظ´
cjn10
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 15 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1267.9
- É¢½ð: 417
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1003
- ÔÚÏß: 190.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 305933
- ×¢²á: 2006-12-10
- רҵ: »·¾³ÎÛȾ»¯Ñ§

4Â¥2011-02-25 14:04:44
smilma
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 22 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3206.3
- É¢½ð: 1851
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 4086
- ÔÚÏß: 253.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 332676
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÇøÓò¿É³ÖÐø·¢Õ¹

2Â¥2011-02-25 10:48:43
ziyeweng
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 78 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 12705.7
- É¢½ð: 5
- ºì»¨: 100
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1478
- ÔÚÏß: 820.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 898876
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹âѧ

3Â¥2011-02-25 11:04:10
laoda111
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3731.9
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1299
- ÔÚÏß: 112.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 454584
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹â×ÓÓë¹âµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ

5Â¥2011-02-25 14:06:45













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÄÜͶ´ËÀ࿯Îï¶¼ÊÇ
20