| 查看: 7024 | 回复: 16 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
outspace588银虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
投到PNAS的文章挂了，发帖纪念一下已有15人参与
|
||
|
1.Stage Start Date Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2011-02-24 Pending Final Recommendation 2011-02-16 Under Editorial Board Review 2011-01-31 Quality Control Review Completed 2011-01-31 Quality Control Review Started 2011-01-29 Author Approved Submission 2011-01-29 Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2011-01-29 Waiting for File Conversion 2011-01-29 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted 2011-01-29 2。拒稿信 第一部分应该是一个拒稿信模板，还好编辑在后边还给了一个remark，虽然没有得到审稿意见，也算是有点收获了。 February 24, 2011 Dear Dr. ******, I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has declined your manuscript [MS# *****]. We receive many more good papers than we can publish and the Board must carefully weigh which papers merit external review. The expert who served as editor concluded that although this work is interesting, it does not have the broad appeal needed for PNAS and is better suited for a more specialized journal. Once a paper has been declined, it may not be resubmitted through an Academy member. Note that the PNAS License to Publish conveyed at initial submission is terminated. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PNAS. I am sorry we cannot be more encouraging this time, and I hope you will consider submitting future work to PNAS. Sincerely yours, Randy Schekman Editor-in-Chief **************************** Editorial Board Member Comments: Editorial Board Member: Overall Rating: Reject w/o review - specialty journal Remarks to Author: I regret that I cannot recommend sending this paper out for review for PNAS. We receive many manuscripts whose subject matter is more specialized than is appropriate for publication in PNAS and I believe that this is such a manuscript. I would suggest submitting it to Geomorphology or to a similar journal that covers this aspect of surficial geology. Thank you for considering PNAS for publication. 3。一点感觉：1.PNAS的投稿程序实在太繁琐了；2。PNAS和NS一样，也追求borad significance。我的专业方向在PNAS给定的学科分类里面竟然 找不到合适的位置，检索了PNAS，竟然没有找到一篇正统的我这个方向的文章。想在上面发文章难，太难了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
难道我真的要放弃吗？
已经有45人回复
-
30岁 想读非全博，求建议
已经有6人回复
-
专科院校申请国自然
已经有29人回复
-
国基在研影响申请结果吗
已经有23人回复
-
是否上会都不知道的三无人员，翻论坛想看会评消息
已经有3人回复
-
我投稿了Elsevier，后来申请撤稿，你不允许我撤稿，强制发表然后问我要钱
已经有10人回复
-
关于论文第一通讯作者的问题？
已经有9人回复
-
第17批博士后特别资助名单
已经有5人回复
-
博士该不该读？
已经有9人回复
-
联培博士文章第一单位署名问题交流~
已经有24人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 纪念一下发表的第一篇文章
已经有18人回复
- 投了第二篇PNAS，希望好运
已经有31人回复
- pending recommendation 之后有 under review
已经有8人回复
- PNAS这是要拒稿吗？看不懂！
已经有10人回复
- 复旦大学教授PNAS文章聚焦糖尿病---ebio
已经有24人回复
- PNAS投稿缴费咨询
已经有9人回复
- 【其他】纯水，纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖纪念帖
已经有7人回复
- 【分享】袁隆平院士两优培九超级杂交水稻转录组分析文章，发表在PNAS上
已经有59人回复
lqingh506
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 314 (大学生)
- 金币: 11122.4
- 散金: 1475
- 红花: 75
- 帖子: 7617
- 在线: 3387.4小时
- 虫号: 723546
- 注册: 2009-03-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
6楼2011-02-25 16:25:02
smilma
木虫 (职业作家)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 金币: 3206.3
- 散金: 1851
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 4086
- 在线: 253.9小时
- 虫号: 332676
- 注册: 2007-03-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 区域可持续发展
2楼2011-02-25 10:48:43
ziyeweng
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 78 (初中生)
- 金币: 12457.8
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 98
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1469
- 在线: 807.3小时
- 虫号: 898876
- 注册: 2009-11-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
能投此类刊物都是3楼2011-02-25 11:04:10
cjn10
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 1267.9
- 散金: 417
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1002
- 在线: 190.1小时
- 虫号: 305933
- 注册: 2006-12-10
- 专业: 环境污染化学
4楼2011-02-25 14:04:44
10