24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

outspace588

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 35.1
散金: 693
红花: 6
帖子: 428
在线: 102.5小时
虫号: 467486
注册: 2007-11-26
专业: 自然地理学

[交流] 投到PNAS的文章挂了，发帖纪念一下已有15人参与

1.Stage Start Date

Review Complete; E-Mail Notification Sent 2011-02-24
Pending Final Recommendation 2011-02-16
Under Editorial Board Review 2011-01-31
Quality Control Review Completed 2011-01-31
Quality Control Review Started 2011-01-29
Author Approved Submission 2011-01-29
Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2011-01-29
Waiting for File Conversion 2011-01-29
Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted 2011-01-29

2。拒稿信
第一部分应该是一个拒稿信模板，还好编辑在后边还给了一个remark，虽然没有得到审稿意见，也算是有点收获了。
February 24, 2011

Dear Dr. ******,

I regret to inform you that the PNAS Editorial Board has declined your manuscript [MS# *****]. We receive many more good papers than we can publish and the Board must carefully weigh which papers merit external review. The expert who served as editor concluded that although this work is interesting, it does not have the broad appeal needed for PNAS and is better suited for a more specialized journal.

Once a paper has been declined, it may not be resubmitted through an Academy member. Note that the PNAS License to Publish conveyed at initial submission is terminated.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PNAS. I am sorry we cannot be more encouraging this time, and I hope you will consider submitting future work to PNAS.

Sincerely yours,
Randy Schekman
Editor-in-Chief

****************************

Editorial Board Member Comments:
Editorial Board Member:

Overall Rating:
Reject w/o review - specialty journal

Remarks to Author:

I regret that I cannot recommend sending this paper out for review for PNAS. We receive many manuscripts whose subject matter is more specialized than is appropriate for publication in PNAS and I believe that this is such a manuscript. I would suggest submitting it to Geomorphology or to a similar journal that covers this aspect of surficial geology. Thank you for considering PNAS for publication.

3。一点感觉：1.PNAS的投稿程序实在太繁琐了；2。PNAS和NS一样，也追求borad significance。我的专业方向在PNAS给定的学科分类里面竟然找不到合适的位置，检索了PNAS，竟然没有找到一篇正统的我这个方向的文章。想在上面发文章难，太难了。

回复此楼