[交流] 【求助】帮我看看审稿人的意见是否又接受的希望

由于各方面的原因自己的文章投了三次被拒了三次，如今终于有一个期刊给发了审稿意见了，不过只有一个审稿人，但是意见很简单，不知道有没有希望接受？？
审稿人意见如下：
The authors reported a series of novel AAAA compounds containing BBBB. The syntheses are carefully described and sufficient data are provided to support the structure assignment. Obviously, target compounds showed good antifungal activities and provided a basis for further SAR studies on the antifungal activities of this class of compounds.
However, it is necessary for the authors to do a better literature research before preparing the manuscript. As far as we know, some similar compounds have been reported previously. Compound 4a、4d appeared in before (Kimer, M. Z. et. al Synthesis and biological activity of CCCCC. Stiinte Biologice si Chimice.1994.1.60-65.). And it is necessary for the authors take this into consideration in the revision.
Some revisions have been made in the text by the reviewer, and the manuscript needs thorough proofreading and editing of the English throughout befre publication.
Introduction: Good
Methodology: Reliable

SECTION IV - Recommandation: (Kindly Mark With An X)

Accept As Is:
Requires Minor Corrections:
Requires Moderate Revision: X
Requires Major Revision:
Submit To Another Publication Such As:
Reject On Grounds Of (Please Be Specific):
Results: Reliable
Discussion: Acceptable
SECTION III - Please rate the following: (1 = Excellent) (2 = Good) (3 = Fair) (4 = poor)

Originality: 3
Contribution To The Field: 2
Technical Quality: 2
Clarity Of Presentation : 3
Depth Of Research: 2
由于之前开展实验时，缺乏调研导致文章，虽然所合成的化合物生物活性还可以，创新性不够，不知道这一次经过修改有没有可能接受，还有文章里有两个化合物有报道过，但是我所采取合成的方法和测的菌不一样，但是审稿人所提供的文章很难找到，所有有经验的虫友给提点建议，看我该怎么办，非常感谢！！

[ Last edited by xiaoruan on 2011-2-14 at 17:21 ]

回复此楼