| 查看: 2613 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！已有6人参与
|
|||
|
审稿96天被拒，编辑的意思是： I am the manging editor in charge of your submission. Your paper was sent to two referees who have worked extensively on this topic. Both have now responded. As you can see from the reports, both referees felt that the paper is not rigorously written and it looks more like notes for an article than a completed paper. While Referee 1 is a little more positive, Referee 2 recommended rejection. As a result of this, I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to publish your paper. 主编所说的第一个审稿人 This paper is potentially interesting for the readers of XXXXXXXXXXX because it contains some original research. However, I have comments on five major points that I think should be clarified or improved in order to better understand the messages from the paper, namely: 1) highlighting the originality of the research; 2) the clearness of the presented methodology; 3) the data sources used for the empirical analysis; 4) the very poor quality of citations and references; 5) the quality of the English used in the paper. 这个审稿人所提的问题大多比较容易解决，后面还有大概两页的审稿意见，这里不多累述，感觉好像没有直接把我拒了。 第二个审稿人只给了短短一页的意见： This is an applied piece of research that tries to measure XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, and make comparisons with other XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. To some extent, the paper is still at a preliminary stage, in what refers to the presentation and explanation of the results. On the one hand, the authors refer to different XXXXXXXXXXXXXX measurement proposals (which are not new to this paper and are not used in this paper) that are presented in a not rigorous way: - They do not use a homogeneous nomenclature when they present different “models of XXXXXXXXXX” - They give expressions for a continuous and a discrete variable in an unspecified way. - Some expressions for XXXXXXXXXXXX are not correct. - They designate XXXXXXXXXX as Di(x), where i refers to AAAAA and x to BBBBBBBBBB should not appear none of them. - They state that “the relation between AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA and BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB is like “S” shape” without stating any reference…. From the beginning the authors talk about the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX without giving any intuition of the concept until its definition in page 6. The authors should make an effort to provide the motivation of the study of XXXXXXXXXXXXX and to improve the discussion of the results, as it is very cursory in its current version. Finally, the articles mentioned through the text are not correctly referenced. In many cases the name of the author is referred together with the surname 麻烦大家帮我看一下编辑以及审稿人的态度。这篇文章花了我很多心血，我搞不清楚按审稿人意思修改以后重投还有没有希望。还应不应该投这个杂志..... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
难道我真的要放弃吗？
已经有45人回复
-
30岁 想读非全博，求建议
已经有6人回复
-
专科院校申请国自然
已经有29人回复
-
国基在研影响申请结果吗
已经有23人回复
-
是否上会都不知道的三无人员，翻论坛想看会评消息
已经有3人回复
-
我投稿了Elsevier，后来申请撤稿，你不允许我撤稿，强制发表然后问我要钱
已经有10人回复
-
关于论文第一通讯作者的问题？
已经有9人回复
-
第17批博士后特别资助名单
已经有5人回复
-
博士该不该读？
已经有9人回复
-
联培博士文章第一单位署名问题交流~
已经有24人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 第一篇投稿被拒，帮我看看审稿人的意见，是否可以采纳，修改重投
已经有15人回复
- 被拒了，想申诉呢，大家帮忙看看拒稿信，还有没有可能？
已经有13人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- 物理学报审稿意见，请大家帮忙看看录用几率多大？修改有哪些注意事项，谢谢了
已经有24人回复
- 求助：主编拒稿了，我认真修改后重投还有希望吗？
已经有34人回复
- 编辑的信，请大家帮我看看，谢谢
已经有9人回复
- 麻烦大家帮我看看这个拒稿意见怎么修改和改投，谢谢！
已经有3人回复
- 请大家帮我看看这个拒稿信。。。
已经有15人回复
- 第一次投SCI遇到了一些问题，希望大家能给予帮助，谢谢了。
已经有6人回复
- Materials Letters拒稿，帮我看看回信的意思！谢谢
已经有22人回复
- 论文被拒，大家帮忙看看没有修改后再投的可能，谢谢
已经有11人回复
- 文章投Chem. Eng. Sci.终审意见如下,麻烦大家帮助看看,是否必要反驳或重投
已经有17人回复
- 文章被拒，请大家帮我看看拒稿信，我应该怎么办？
已经有31人回复
- 第一次投稿,评审结果出来了,大家帮我看看好吗
已经有36人回复
- 几乎要崩溃了！大家帮我看看是否有挽回的余地？谢谢了
已经有112人回复
xjajx
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.796
- 金币: 10465.4
- 散金: 992
- 红花: 46
- 沙发: 5
- 帖子: 1967
- 在线: 495.2小时
- 虫号: 1134415
- 注册: 2010-10-29
- 专业: 半导体材料
10楼2011-02-11 18:29:33
10