24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

pies112

铁虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 128.1
帖子: 451
在线: 95.8小时
虫号: 447047

[交流] 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！

首先感谢大家！
但是我很着急，我过年的心情都没了，大家帮帮我，审稿人的意思是要和其他相似的传感器做比较么？
从覆盖度和电子转移速率方面，对过氧化氢的催化校正曲线都是从0开始的么？？？
匮乏的分析内容指的是？？？
The work is well carried out but has very little analytical content, merely a few measurements of hydrogen peroxide to demonstrate electrocatalysis giving an analytical curve with non-zero intercept. No comparison is made between the merits of this peroxide sensor with others in the literature and should be. I therefore cannot recommend it for publication in this journal.

Referee: 2
My main problem with the manuscript is that there is no experimental evidence shown about the applicability of the electrode. No real analytical application has been tried. No comparison with other methods or electrodes in solving special tasks. There are very many paper dealing with the electrode reactions of hemoglobin, similarly about response of hydrogen peroxide in different electrodes. The only novelty- I can guess- can be structure, and preparation procedure of the polymer film. (The detailed preparation procedure has been reported elsewhere). I hope the revised copy will be extended that direction

I agree withthat it will be necessary to enhance the novelty and analytical content of the paper. It will be necessary to employ the device for practical analysis of real (not spiked) samples, and to compare the device to previously described similar devices.

回复此楼