| ²é¿´: 1966 | »Ø¸´: 12 | ||||
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚÌú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[½»Á÷]
nanotechnology
|
|
07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂ×´¿ö |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
decision in progress |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖÐÄÏ»¯Ñ§337Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
279·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á˶ʿ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
296Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿1-2ÈË
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
274Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
nanotechnologyͶ¸å
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¼±ÇóNanotechnologyͶ¸åµÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
nanotechnologyÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸å
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
»ªÄÏÀí¹¤-¹ãÖÐÒ½ÁªºÏÕÐÊÕÉúÎïҽѧÓë²ÄÁϽ»²æÑ§¿Æ²©Ê¿Éú
+1/84
ÖØÇìÒ½¿Æ´óѧÉñ¾¿ÆÑ§ÖÐÐÄ/²¡ÉúÓëÉúÀíϵ³ÏÑûº£ÄÚÍâÓÅÐ㲩ʿ¼ÓÃ˲©Ê¿ºó¶ÓÎ飨³¤ÆÚ£©
+1/81
Æ®ÔÚÃÀ¹ú£¬ÓеãÏë¼Ò
+1/53
Ìì½ò¹¤Òµ´óѧº½¿Õº½Ì첩ʿÕÐÉú
+1/32
»ªÄÏʦ·¶´óѧ£¨211£©²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú- µç×Ó¡¢×Ô¶¯»¯¡¢»úе¡¢ÉúÎïѧ¡¢ÎïÀíÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ
+2/32
ºþÄÏ´óѧ΢ÉúÎï½á¹¹Ó빦ÄÜʵÑéÊÒ2026Äê¼Æ»®ÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/19
Õã½ÖÐÒ½Ò©´óѧ¸±Ð£³¤ÍŶÓÕÐÆ¸Ò©Ñ§/ÉúÎïÐÅϢѧµÈ·½Ïò¸ßУ½Ìʦ7Ãû£¬±¨ÃûͨµÀÒÑ¿ªÆô
+1/18
±±¾©º½¿Õº½Ìì´óѧÕÐÉú΢Á÷¿ØÓëÖÇÄÜ´òÓ¡¼¼Êõ·½Ïò²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+2/14
½Î÷¸ÓÖÝ-¸ÓÄÏʦ·¶´óѧ-Ñ§Ð£ÍÆ¼ö
+1/10
ÐÂ¼ÓÆÂ¹úÁ¢´óѧҩѧϵ»¯Ñ§ÉúÎïѧ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐPhD
+1/7
Çൺ¿Æ¼¼´óѧ¿É³ÖÐø¸ß·Ö×ÓÍÅ¶Ó ¿¼ÑÐÕÐÉú
+1/6
¡¾Î人¸ßУ¡¿¡¾ÐÂÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏÓëÆ÷¼þ¿ÎÌâ×é¡¿ ÕÐÊÕÓÅÐã˶ʿµ÷¼ÁÉú£¡£¡£¡
+5/5
ÖпÆÔºÉϺ£Î¢ÏµÍ³Ëù²ÄÁÏÉú³¤ÀíÂÛÓë·ÂÕæ¿ÎÌâ×é-²©Ê¿ºóÕÐÆ¸£¨²ÄÁϼÆËãÓëAI4S£©
+1/3
ÉîÛÚ´óѧ²ÌÐ˿ƿÎÌâ×鲩ʿºó¼°Ñо¿ÖúÀíÕÐÆ¸
+1/2
323·Ö¿ØÖƹ¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
+1/2
¹ú¼Ò½ÜÇàµÍά²ÄÁÏÓëÆ÷¼þÁ¦Ñ§ÍŶÓ2026ÄêÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/2
Ê×´ÎÕÐÊÕ×ʸñ£¬ÕÐÊÕ¹¤¿Æµ÷¼Á£¡
+1/1
Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧÉúÃüѧԺÖÇÄÜ»¯ÕïÁÆ×°±¸Ñо¿ÖÐÐÄ2026Ä격ʿÉúÕÐÉú
+1/1
°ÍÈûÂÞÄÇ×ÔÖδóѧ£¨UAB£©-°ÍÈûÂÞÄDzÄÁÏÑо¿Ëù£¨ICMAB£©ÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/1
Î人ÇṤ´óѧÍÁľˮÀûÇཷ˶µ¼Õе÷¼Á
+1/1
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
|
ÔΣ¬ËÍÁËÕâô¶àÉó¸åÈË£¿ ´ËÔÓÖ¾ÊÕµ½Èý¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û¾ÍÐС£ ÍíÉÏ×¢Òâ²éÊÕÓÊÏ䣬Éó¸åÒâ¼û¼´½«µ½´ï¡£ |
2Â¥2011-02-08 15:35:45
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
3Â¥2011-02-08 15:53:01
wulishi8
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +373 - SEPI: 5
- Ó¦Öú: 1195 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.888
- ½ð±Ò: 28970.7
- Ìû×Ó: 7711
- ÔÚÏß: 1702.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 654606
4Â¥2011-02-08 18:22:03
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-08 18:59:10
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:39
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:39
| Unable to report ÊÇÉó¸åÈ˾ÜÉó£¬ÎÒµ±Ê±µÄһƪÓÐÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈËUnable to report£¬×îºóÊÕµ½ÁíÍâÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵Äreferee Report¡£ÄãÕâÖÖÇé¿ö²»ÖªÊDz»ÊÇÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÏà×ó£¬ÔÙÕÒÁ˵ÚÈý¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬È»ºó»¹ÊDz»ÄÜÈ·¶¨£¬×îºó¶¯ÓÃÁËBoard level decision¡£ |
5Â¥2011-02-08 18:31:36
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): iop»¹Êǹ«Õý 2011-02-08 19:03:19
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:46
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:46
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
6Â¥2011-02-08 18:49:00
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
|
µÚÒ» The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology. µÚ¶þ£º The work is a continuation of previous studies of the same group¡£ The presented results are interesting and provide new concepts for the fabrication of nanostuctures in solution. Therefore I recommend publication of the manuscript in Nanotechnology. However, before publication the manuscript needs severe correction of the English language as well as of many typos. µÚÈý£º In conclusion, publication of this paper in Nanotechnology is recommended after a minor, compulsory revision. [ Last edited by ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ on 2011-2-8 at 19:02 ] |
7Â¥2011-02-08 18:59:59
8Â¥2011-02-08 19:17:43
9Â¥2011-02-09 07:36:57
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
10Â¥2011-02-09 08:09:57
11Â¥2011-02-09 08:46:57
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
12Â¥2011-02-09 08:53:37
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
|
Third referee's second report The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology. However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact. I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task |
13Â¥2011-03-03 21:16:01













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
×£ºØ£¡