应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » nanotechnology
131/1返回列表
查看: 2068  |  回复: 12
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] nanotechnology

07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report


请大家帮我分析一下状况
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

decision in progress

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-02-08 15:28:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
天道酬勤(金币+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
晕，送了这么多审稿人？ 此杂志收到三个审稿意见就行。
晚上注意查收邮箱，审稿意见即将到达。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2011-02-08 15:35:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-08 15:35:45:
晕，送了这么多审稿人？ 此杂志收到三个审稿意见就行。
晚上注意查收邮箱，审稿意见即将到达。

谢谢
回复此楼
3楼2011-02-08 15:53:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wulishi8

专家顾问 (知名作家)
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-08 18:59:02
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:34
貌似是找的审稿人不够，需要用到Board level decision了，结果很快就会出来的。有悲剧的可能。祝福！
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2011-02-08 18:22:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lesley7331

木虫 (正式写手)
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-08 18:59:10
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:39
Unable to report 是审稿人拒审，我当时的一篇有两个审稿人Unable to report，最后收到另外两个审稿人的referee Report。你这种情况不知是不是两个审稿人意见相左，再找了第三个审稿人，然后还是不能确定，最后动用了Board level decision。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2011-02-08 18:31:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

faming

禁言 (著名写手)
天道酬勤(金币+1): iop还是公正 2011-02-08 19:03:19
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:46
本帖内容被屏蔽
6楼2011-02-08 18:49:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
第一
The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology.

第二：
The work is a continuation of previous studies of the same group。
The presented results are interesting and provide new concepts for the fabrication of nanostuctures in solution. Therefore I recommend publication of the manuscript in Nanotechnology.

However, before publication the manuscript needs severe correction of the English language as well as of many typos.

第三：
In conclusion, publication of this paper in Nanotechnology is recommended after a minor, compulsory revision.

[ Last edited by 天道酬勤 on 2011-2-8 at 19:02 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2011-02-08 18:59:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lesley7331

木虫 (正式写手)
天道酬勤(金币+1): thanks 2011-02-08 20:21:29
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:25:03
引用回帖:
Originally posted by 天道酬勤 at 2011-02-08 18:59:59:
第一
The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology.

第二：
The work is a continuation of previous stud ...

祝贺！
回复此楼
8楼2011-02-08 19:17:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)
主编的决定是？？？
赞一下 回复此楼
9楼2011-02-09 07:36:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-09 07:36:57:
主编的决定是？？？

The referee(s) have recommended that
substantial changes be made to your paper.

Please can you revise your paper following the referee recommendations, and
then send us the revised version together with a list of the changes you
have made.
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2011-02-09 08:09:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)
编辑很生气啊，对第一个审稿人很不满啊。
恭喜啊！
赞一下 回复此楼
11楼2011-02-09 08:46:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-09 08:46:57:
编辑很生气啊，对第一个审稿人很不满啊。
恭喜啊！

第一审稿人估计没好好看
赞一下 回复此楼
12楼2011-02-09 08:53:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
Third referee's second report

The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology.
However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact.
I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task
赞一下 回复此楼
13楼2011-03-03 21:16:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 天道酬勤 的主题更新
131/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭