| ²é¿´: 1970 | »Ø¸´: 12 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||||
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚÌú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[½»Á÷]
nanotechnology
|
|||
|
07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂ×´¿ö |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
decision in progress |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
346Çóµ÷¼Á[0856]
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
һ־Ըɽ´ó07»¯Ñ§ 332·Ö ËÄÁù¼¶Òѹý ±¾¿ÆÉ½¶«Ë«·Ç Çóµ÷¼Á£¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
310Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
»úеר˶299Çóµ÷¼ÁÖÁ²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
08¹¤¿Æ 320×Ü·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
nanotechnologyͶ¸å
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¼±ÇóNanotechnologyͶ¸åµÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
nanotechnologyÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸å
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
ũҵÐÅÏ¢¹¤³Ì¼¼Êõ£¨×¨Ë¶£©ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á ÉòÑôũҵ´óѧ
+1/184
µçÁ¦È«¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ˫һÁ÷AÀ೤½Ñ§ÕßÍŶÓÕÐ2026ÄêÈ«ÈÕÖÆ²©Ê¿1Ãû£¨4ÔÂ3ÈÕ½ØÖ¹£©
+2/100
¼ÃÄÏ´óѧÁÖÐã¾ê½ÌÊÚÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÀ಩ʿÉú
+1/84
ÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯ѧÏà¹Ø×¨ÒµË¶Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/83
º£ÄÏ´óѧ»¯¹¤ÔºÉúÎïÖʶ¨Ïòת»¯¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿/˶ʿ£¬2026Äê9ÔÂÈëѧ
+1/82
¼ÓÄô󰢶û²®Ëþ´óѧÕÐÊÕµç´Å¡¢ÎÞÏßͨÐÅ¡¢»úÆ÷ѧϰ·½ÏòÈ«½±Ë¶Ê¿/²©Ê¿/²©Ê¿ºó/·ÃÎÊѧÕß
+1/53
Î人¸ßУ½ÓÊÜÑо¿Éúµ÷¼Á£¬²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§¡¢·ÄÖ¯·½Ïò
+2/50
ßÅßáÃÀÐÁÔÁÏÒ©ºÏ³É½»Á÷
+1/35
¸£½¨Ê¦·¶´óѧÃö½Ñ§Õß³ÂΡ½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ2026Ä껯ѧ¡¢»¯¹¤»ò²ÄÁÏרҵµÄѧ˶6Ãû
+1/34
ÉϺ£½»´ó»¯Ôº¹¦ÄÜ´ó·Ö×ÓÍŶÓÕÐ2026Äê˶ʿ¡¢ÁªÅà¡¢²©Ê¿ºó
+1/31
Î÷±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ¹â×ÓѧÑо¿ÍÅ¶Ó³ÏÆ¸²©Ê¿ºó£¡
+2/30
ºþÄÏ´óѧ΢ÉúÎï½á¹¹Ó빦ÄÜʵÑéÊÒ2026Äê¼Æ»®ÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/15
Äþ²¨¶«·½Àí¹¤´óѧÓàÅô¿ÎÌâ×é2026ÄêÉϺ£½»´óÁªÅ಩ʿÉú¡¢²©Ê¿ºó¡¢¿ÆÑÐÖúÀíÕÐÆ¸
+1/15
¡¾2026¿¼Ñе÷¼Á¡¿ÄÏ·½¿Æ¼¼´óѧ-ÉîÛÚÀí¹¤´óѧÁªÅà 086000 ÃâÒß·½Ïò(26.9Èëѧ)
+1/12
5hanÒ»±¾Ç¿Ð£ÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏרҵ˶ʿ
+1/7
26ÄêÉ격×Ô¼ö-¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õ
+1/5
26ÄêÉ격×Ô¼ö-¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õ
+1/5
2026¿¼ÑеÄͬѧ£¬·ÖÊý²»¹»£¿Ïëµ÷¼ÁÉϰ¶µÄͬѧ£¬À´¿´
+1/2
ÎÂÖÝÒ½¿Æ´óѧÕÐÊÕÌØÖÖҽѧ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú1Ãû£¨×¨Òµ²»ÏÞ£¬ÓÐʵÑé»ù´¡£©
+1/2
ÇóÈÕÓï»úеµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸³¤°²´óѧר˶332
+1/1
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
|
Third referee's second report The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology. However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact. I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task |
13Â¥2011-03-03 21:16:01
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ(½ð±Ò+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
|
ÔΣ¬ËÍÁËÕâô¶àÉó¸åÈË£¿ ´ËÔÓÖ¾ÊÕµ½Èý¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û¾ÍÐС£ ÍíÉÏ×¢Òâ²éÊÕÓÊÏ䣬Éó¸åÒâ¼û¼´½«µ½´ï¡£ |
2Â¥2011-02-08 15:35:45
ÌìµÀ³êÇÚ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.012
- ½ð±Ò: 6434.4
- Ìû×Ó: 3164
- ÔÚÏß: 389.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 258086
3Â¥2011-02-08 15:53:01
wulishi8
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +373 - SEPI: 5
- Ó¦Öú: 1195 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.888
- ½ð±Ò: 28970.7
- Ìû×Ó: 7711
- ÔÚÏß: 1702.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 654606
4Â¥2011-02-08 18:22:03













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥