24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 1.012
金币: 6434.4
帖子: 3164
在线: 389.8小时
虫号: 258086

[交流] nanotechnology

07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report

请大家帮我分析一下状况

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

decision in progress

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

nanotechnology投稿已经有15人回复
急求Nanotechnology投稿的模板已经有6人回复
nanotechnology期刊投稿已经有10人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-02-08 15:28:47

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

天道酬勤

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 1.012
金币: 6434.4
帖子: 3164
在线: 389.8小时
虫号: 258086

Third referee's second report

The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology.
However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact.
I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task