24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1967  |  回复: 12

[交流] nanotechnology

07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received
11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report


请大家帮我分析一下状况
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

decision in progress

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
天道酬勤(金币+1): xie 2011-02-08 16:30:06
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:19
晕,送了这么多审稿人? 此杂志收到三个审稿意见就行。
晚上注意查收邮箱,审稿意见即将到达。
2楼2011-02-08 15:35:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-08 15:35:45:
晕,送了这么多审稿人? 此杂志收到三个审稿意见就行。
晚上注意查收邮箱,审稿意见即将到达。

谢谢
3楼2011-02-08 15:53:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-08 18:59:02
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:34
貌似是找的审稿人不够,需要用到Board level decision了,结果很快就会出来的。有悲剧的可能。祝福!
4楼2011-02-08 18:22:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lesley7331

木虫 (正式写手)


天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-08 18:59:10
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:39
Unable to report 是审稿人拒审,我当时的一篇有两个审稿人Unable to report,最后收到另外两个审稿人的referee Report。你这种情况不知是不是两个审稿人意见相左,再找了第三个审稿人,然后还是不能确定,最后动用了Board level decision。
5楼2011-02-08 18:31:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

faming

禁言 (著名写手)

天道酬勤(金币+1): iop还是公正 2011-02-08 19:03:19
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:24:46
本帖内容被屏蔽

6楼2011-02-08 18:49:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
第一
The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology.

第二:
The work is a continuation of previous studies of the same group。
The presented results are interesting and provide new concepts for the fabrication of nanostuctures in solution. Therefore I recommend publication of the manuscript in Nanotechnology.

However, before publication the manuscript needs severe correction of the English language as well as of many typos.

第三:
In conclusion, publication of this paper in Nanotechnology is recommended after a minor, compulsory revision.

[ Last edited by 天道酬勤 on 2011-2-8 at 19:02 ]
7楼2011-02-08 18:59:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lesley7331

木虫 (正式写手)


天道酬勤(金币+1): thanks 2011-02-08 20:21:29
天道酬勤(金币+1): 2011-02-14 09:25:03
引用回帖:
Originally posted by 天道酬勤 at 2011-02-08 18:59:59:
第一
The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology.

第二:
The work is a continuation of previous stud ...

祝贺!
8楼2011-02-08 19:17:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)


主编的决定是???
9楼2011-02-09 07:36:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-09 07:36:57:
主编的决定是???

The referee(s) have recommended that
substantial changes be made to your paper.

Please can you revise your paper following the referee recommendations, and
then send us the revised version together with a list of the changes you
have made.
10楼2011-02-09 08:09:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiare80

金虫 (正式写手)


编辑很生气啊,对第一个审稿人很不满啊。
恭喜啊!
11楼2011-02-09 08:46:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by xiare80 at 2011-02-09 08:46:57:
编辑很生气啊,对第一个审稿人很不满啊。
恭喜啊!

第一审稿人估计没好好看
12楼2011-02-09 08:53:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
Third referee's second report

The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology.
However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact.
I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task
13楼2011-03-03 21:16:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 天道酬勤 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 08工学调剂 +4 用户573181 2026-03-20 4/200 2026-03-20 10:32 by 朗月清风1
[考研] 298-一志愿中国农业大学-求调剂 +8 手机用户 2026-03-17 8/400 2026-03-20 09:32 by 陆伶越
[考研] 295材料求调剂,一志愿武汉理工085601专硕 +3 Charlieyq 2026-03-19 3/150 2026-03-20 08:53 by xingguangj
[考研] 0703化学调剂 ,六级已过,有科研经历 +12 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 12/600 2026-03-19 19:42 by maocaozhuxi
[考研] 288求调剂,一志愿华南理工大学071005 +5 ioodiiij 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-19 18:22 by zcl123
[考研] 复试调剂 +4 z1z2z3879 2026-03-14 6/300 2026-03-19 17:18 by fei626-918
[考研] 321求调剂 +8 何润采123 2026-03-18 10/500 2026-03-19 16:46 by 何润采123
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程专硕330分求调剂 +7 小材化本科 2026-03-18 7/350 2026-03-19 10:46 by Linda Hu
[考研] 344求调剂 +6 knight344 2026-03-16 7/350 2026-03-18 20:13 by walc
[考研] 070300化学319求调剂 +6 锦鲤0909 2026-03-17 6/300 2026-03-18 13:22 by Iveryant
[考研] 304求调剂 +12 小熊joy 2026-03-14 13/650 2026-03-18 12:34 by Linda Hu
[考研] 0703化学336分求调剂 +6 zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 7/350 2026-03-18 09:53 by zhukairuo
[考研] 301求调剂 +9 yy要上岸呀 2026-03-17 9/450 2026-03-18 08:58 by 无际的草原
[考研] 一志愿南京大学,080500材料科学与工程,调剂 +4 Jy? 2026-03-16 4/200 2026-03-17 11:02 by gaoqiong
[考研] 一志愿,福州大学材料专硕339分求调剂 +3 木子momo青争 2026-03-15 3/150 2026-03-17 07:52 by laoshidan
[考研] 274求调剂 +5 时间点 2026-03-13 5/250 2026-03-17 07:34 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 11408 一志愿西电,277分求调剂 +3 zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-17 07:03 by laoshidan
[考研] 277材料科学与工程080500求调剂 +3 自由煎饼果子 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-16 14:10 by 运气yunqi
[考研] 本科南京大学一志愿川大药学327 +3 麦田耕者 2026-03-14 3/150 2026-03-14 20:04 by 外星文明
[考研] 289求调剂 +4 这么名字咋样 2026-03-14 6/300 2026-03-14 18:58 by userper
信息提示
请填处理意见